mustangtestuser

I'd like to know the same thing. The S197 sets the rev limiter at 6,250 rpm. Then the Bullitt bumped it up to 6,400 rpm. Now, I read Ford has increased the rev limiter to 6,500 rpm for 2010. My Bamachips tune originally had a 6,800 rpm rev limiter.

I have no idea which one I should choose. I'm guessing at least 6,500 rpm must be safe, since that's what Ford is doing on the 2010.

MELLOWYELLOW06

As good as it sounds, I would be afraid to rev that high.

onederful100

i wouldnt rev it past 6500.

onederful100

6-700 bucks is pretty cheap.

Flyingpants

I wonder what then will be the real benefit of this manifold? It sure good lookin though!

TPony

Interesting....

americaniron

Looks good for sure.

Rubrignitz

My limiter is set for 6800. It gets there before I know it and bumps it still pulling extremely hard. When the cams were installed they ran it out to a 7k chart. On the stock cams the powerband would flop over at ~6200 rpm so I never worried with setting the limiter higher than that. I'm very interested in any new manifold . The C&L has been a disappointment.

One Bad Stang

i would call it cheap compared to the C&L piece, but still pricey compared to gears or cams that will get you a better gain. i would personally rather have gears - done - or cams first. but after cams, that would defenatly be worth it.

howarmat

If you are getting cams then the 700 is well worth it because i am sure the gains will be there. I would be willing to bet additional 20 HP from this with a good cam setup. People will be able to reach 400 hp alot easier with heads and cams and a new manifold.