Final Exhaust Evaluation - Roush/Magnaflows

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-06-2009, 03:40 PM

#11

gman73

5th Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location: Escondido, California

Posts: 2,018

Never mind, those are the magnapacks.

11-06-2009, 04:31 PM

#12

wilkinda

2010 Section Moderator

Join Date: May 2008

Location: Lithia, FL

Posts: 3,328

nice job on getting those vids for the comparision. i stiull like the Roush better though. I have 8900 miles on mine. Have had the Roush since 483 miles and I drive around alot with the windows down because the sound STILL gets my blood pumping

11-06-2009, 06:58 PM

#13

FastDEW

3rd Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2009

Location: CA

Posts: 599

The videos of the Roush vs the Magnaflows for sound are good. But the driving videos I cannot hear droan from either. The Roush cracking sound when you pop the throttle sounds wrong to me. I wouldn't like that.

Well, I am going with the Magnaflows anyway, but the car needs to get here first......

11-07-2009, 12:14 PM

#14

gman73

5th Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location: Escondido, California

Posts: 2,018

Later on change you midpipe. The stock catted H with magnapacks do sound good, but magnapacks with a MAC prochamber and hi-flows sound even better. If you want the sound of the 2v or 4v previous gen. mustangs, this set-up will not produce that sound. The sound can be best described as a comb of a 05-10 mustang and a 60s early 70s mustang.