Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New 2011 GT Better be faster than a Jeep!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2009, 11:13 PM
  #11  
Riptide
6th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montaner
Posts: 6,193
Default

If it makes you feel better the 2005 GT is spec'd to 4.9 seconds 0-60. Road & Track.
Riptide is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 07:13 AM
  #12  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

So a Jeep and a Mustang both with 400 ponies, and the Jeep is faster with mucho more weight?
Tell me how that works...
pascal is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 07:28 AM
  #13  
jasezero
2nd Gear Member
 
jasezero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by SirKnightTG
WTF is this ****? A Jeep is supposed to be an off road vehicle. Being fast on the street is losing focus of what a Jeep was designed for and makes about as much sense as making a Prius a performance vehicle. Same goes for trucks. It's for working/hauling FFS!

Chrysler totally ruined the Jeep brand by turning away from the hardcore off-road type it used to be to this oh look at me I'm a cool soccer mom thing.

If I had a jeep I can guarantee it would not be fast. But it would have the low end power to muck through deep mud and climb a freaking wall..you know, what a Jeep is SUPPOSED to be able to do. It would also be an early 80's CJ-7 or similar.

The Hummer brand was also screwed up thanks to the H2 and H3. The brand went from being this ultimate off road machine to a hey look at how much money I have thing...and the vehicles (H2 and H3) suffered for it with very poor off road performance.

Lame.

(BTW, this is not the first time I heard about the Jeep SRT8 in-case it may sound that way)
the SRT8 is specifically not off road capable. They don't have the trail rating like all other jeeps do (except for one other, I think the Compass or something small like that).

The H3 is actually a very capable off road car. The only reason some of the Jeeps do better in some cases is because of the size. Tight, narrow off road stuff the H3 isn't good at. But give it open area (and especially sand), and the H3 really shines. There are multiple reviews about a year ago regarding just this (Car and Driver I know had one, I think Motor Trend did something too). And honestly, the H3 as a daily is pretty decent. I've towed a couple cars with it, the snow traction is great, and its comfortable. I'm not arguing that the brand was diluted with the consumer models, but its not a bad SUV for what it is.
jasezero is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:03 AM
  #14  
WeinerDog
4th Gear Member
 
WeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,247
Default

Originally Posted by Riptide
If it makes you feel better the 2005 GT is spec'd to 4.9 seconds 0-60. Road & Track.
Same with the '10, by both Car and Driver and Motor Trend.
WeinerDog is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:15 AM
  #15  
def67
2nd Gear Member
 
def67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 242
Default

Doesnt Dodge own Jeep? To me thats why they kind of have to make jeeps like that so they can compete with the Ford and Gm Soccer mum SUV's. I dont know of any off the top of my head that are dodges. I could be wrong though. GM and Ford bolth have many options for a soccer mom, Equinox, Suburban, Explorer ect...

I have to admit though that I really am not into SUV's or 4 by 4's
def67 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:31 AM
  #16  
dominant1
3rd Gear Member
 
dominant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 659
Default

A 2010 GT with 3.73 gears goes 0-60 in 4.9 seconds. You have to remember that all wheel drive grabs much better then rear wheel drive...The 2011 gt will probably be quicker 0-60 then a gt-500 but after that point the gt-500 will overtake it...
dominant1 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:13 AM
  #17  
Lax07
2nd Gear Member
 
Lax07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 464
Default

I don't think it will be faster 0-60 than the Gt500... but it will be closer... The problem is you guys are comparing cars that are significantly more expensive. When I compare the speed of this car to other cars I look at cars in the price range or cheaper...
Lax07 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:20 AM
  #18  
2011Black5.0
4th Gear Member
 
2011Black5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,685
Default

[QUOTE=def67;6679921]Doesnt Dodge own Jeep?QUOTE]

fiat owns dodge chrysler jeep now lol
2011Black5.0 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:25 PM
  #19  
WeinerDog
4th Gear Member
 
WeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,247
Default

Originally Posted by Lax07
I don't think it will be faster 0-60 than the Gt500... but it will be closer...
I think he meant due to excessive wheelspin, something I've heard mentioned many times about the GT500 on stock tires. Slicks and it's game over.
WeinerDog is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 01:58 PM
  #20  
1987MustangGT5.0
2nd Gear Member
 
1987MustangGT5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Lax07
I don't think it will be faster 0-60 than the Gt500... but it will be closer... The problem is you guys are comparing cars that are significantly more expensive. When I compare the speed of this car to other cars I look at cars in the price range or cheaper...
If I owned an AWD Jeep SUV I would love nothing more than beating the snot out of Mustang owners. People love racing/beating Mustangs because Mustangs are "supposed" to be all that and a bag of chips in terms of affordable speed. The problem is friggin' Accords and crap like that are pretty damn quick now. I hope the 2011 GT does have 400 hp. It would be very nice to see the Mustang once again get a couple of car lengths on some of the more hum-drum cars.
1987MustangGT5.0 is offline  


Quick Reply: New 2011 GT Better be faster than a Jeep!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 AM.