Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

hot rod cams or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2010, 09:56 PM
  #21  
twilson1918
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
twilson1918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by SirKnightTG
Yes, but I'm planning on 4.10s perhaps. I have an auto.

But, when tuned right, the Hot Rods drive 99% like stock (as far as drive-ability that is). I have a Brenspeed tune and I feel no low end loss. It feels great and super responsive all over.

Oh and 750 idle FTW!

Thats one thing i was worried about as well hearing all these people complain about low end loss. I was debating whether to do gears first or after the cam install to compensate for the loss?

Last edited by twilson1918; 02-26-2010 at 10:05 PM.
twilson1918 is offline  
Old 02-26-2010, 11:05 PM
  #22  
Marc S
1st Gear Member
 
Marc S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 70
Default

Here is a copy of the dyno sheet after the Hot Rod install. It picked up 29 HP and 11 ft lbs of torque on a Mustang dyno. HP and torque across the entire range improved. I have zero driveability issues and I get 25 MPG on the interstate. My idle is set at 750 RPM's and sounds very good with the L/T headers and O/R prochamber. There are other cams that make more power. However, there are other cams that make less power than the Hot Rod's. I have no regrets going with the Hot Rod's.
Marc S is offline  
Old 02-26-2010, 11:19 PM
  #23  
twilson1918
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
twilson1918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 295
Default

[QUOTE=Marc S;6844376]Here is a copy of the dyno sheet after the Hot Rod install. It picked up 29 HP and 11 ft lbs of torque on a Mustang dyno. HP and torque across the entire range improved. I have zero driveability issues and I get 25 MPG on the interstate. My idle is set at 750 RPM's and sounds very good with the L/T headers and O/R prochamber. There are other cams that make more power. However, there are other cams that make less power than the Hot Rod's. I have no regrets going with the Hot Rod's.

damn thats more than i expected in gains. Thanks for the info! and is it just me all i see is a giant pic of your car which looks great btw.
twilson1918 is offline  
Old 02-26-2010, 11:31 PM
  #24  
blacllkllsi
3rd Gear Member
 
blacllkllsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 582
Default

I love my hot rod cams as well. I have 0 driveability issues and get compliments on the sound often. You can really feel the difference in the upper RPM's. I picked up a significant amount of power with my mods listed and the cams. My car dynoed at 331rwhp and 333rwt on a mustang dyno.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkmUg5U6Y0c
blacllkllsi is offline  
Old 02-26-2010, 11:41 PM
  #25  
Marc S
1st Gear Member
 
Marc S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 70
Default

Sometimes on this site my sig photo becomes huge. I removed it, thanks for the compliment though.

blac,
It looks we have just about the same mods except I have the stock mufflers still. I wonder if mufflers at our HP level makes a difference. If not, you got me by 5 HP! LOL
Marc S is offline  
Old 02-27-2010, 01:29 AM
  #26  
stealth_GT
6th Gear Member
 
stealth_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Pole
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by blacllkllsi
I love my hot rod cams as well. I have 0 driveability issues and get compliments on the sound often. You can really feel the difference in the upper RPM's. I picked up a significant amount of power with my mods listed and the cams. My car dynoed at 331rwhp and 333rwt on a mustang dyno.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkmUg5U6Y0c
damn.. that's one serious looking GT.

stealth_GT is offline  
Old 02-27-2010, 02:03 PM
  #27  
furface
 
furface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: IA
Posts: 12
Default

you can hear the cams at jegs.com just go to ford cams for 4.6 3v
furface is offline  
Old 02-27-2010, 02:47 PM
  #28  
twilson1918
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
twilson1918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 295
Default

[QUOTE=blacllkllsi;6844421]I love my hot rod cams as well. I have 0 driveability issues and get compliments on the sound often. You can really feel the difference in the upper RPM's. I picked up a significant amount of power with my mods listed and the cams. My car dynoed at 331rwhp and 333rwt on a mustang dyno.

Wow that sounds ridic as well. Any drone with your exhaust?
twilson1918 is offline  
Old 02-27-2010, 03:20 PM
  #29  
top00cat
2nd Gear Member
 
top00cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 250
Default

do you have lts? I am still on the fence with them. To the op, your torque curve changes, so the car still makes good power up top when a stock mustang would die off
top00cat is offline  
Old 02-27-2010, 05:17 PM
  #30  
twilson1918
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
twilson1918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by top00cat
do you have lts? I am still on the fence with them. To the op, your torque curve changes, so the car still makes good power up top when a stock mustang would die off
who was that directed toward? i dont have longtubes. Also, how bad is the installation or should i just have brenspeed do it being that i live so close to them.
twilson1918 is offline  


Quick Reply: hot rod cams or no?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.