98 trans am vs 2005 mustang gt

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-13-2010, 02:10 AM

#21

stealth_GT

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: North Pole

Posts: 6,716

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronniegibson1978

a stock ta in 98 was rated at like 305 hp but they were seriously underrated from factory and they weight like 3200 to 3300 lbs...GM did a heck of a job of selling that car as de-tuned vette...but they're a monster

a older woman came into my shop in a late model WS6 with a messed up light (broken bracket), when it was time to pull it out of the garage I wanted so bad to do a burn out behind the building lol it looked friggin' sick...

05-13-2010, 09:26 AM

#22

SUP3R D4VE

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2010

Location: Kentucky

Posts: 110

Quote:

Originally Posted by nola504boy

97 is a lt1 98 and up is a ls1 big difference lt1=275 to285hp ls1=305 to350hp but it should be a good race

yeah good call on that, i thought about it about 5 min after i posted but was to lazy to go and edit.

anyways good win!

05-13-2010, 12:10 PM

#23

Stkjock

Retired Mod

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: Long Island, NY

Posts: 7,658

wrong section..... S197 mods sleeping at the switch again...

05-15-2010, 05:14 PM

#24

07blkgt62

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: north carolina

Posts: 85

New vs new, the T/A has a slight advantage

05-15-2010, 07:36 PM

#25

Lupo222

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Posts: 470

I ran a T/A last night at the track. Almost positive it was an LS1 but I do know that it was DEFINETLY Cammed!! Sounded more aggressive than my car! He pulled up at the end but I was leadin him the whole way down the track before he pulls up.

I will say this though: he wasn't a very good driver, even though he had DRs to my street tires...