2011 Super Charger
#24
The simple truth no one wants to admit here IMHO. Is that to get the kind of numbers some of you guys would like to see is going to require some internal work. Lower compression pistons, much stronger rods, and something likely better than standard ARP studs. (Like L19 studs) Then you have an engine thats actually really setup for forced induction. And THEN you can safely take it to stupid high output without having to wonder A. If it can make the power safely in the first place, and B. How long will it realistically last if actually used often.
#26
The simple truth no one wants to admit here IMHO. Is that to get the kind of numbers some of you guys would like to see is going to require some internal work. Lower compression pistons, much stronger rods, and something likely better than standard ARP studs. (Like L19 studs) Then you have an engine thats actually really setup for forced induction. And THEN you can safely take it to stupid high output without having to wonder A. If it can make the power safely in the first place, and B. How long will it realistically last if actually used often.
#28
^ Thats true, but you can not tell me that engine was intended (as configured) for forced induction. It may have great things like oil squirter's which are common on FI engines. But with the rods and compression it comes with from Ford. That engine is NOT anywhere near optimized for forced induction. That is fact, and thats mostly what I was getting at. Optimize it for forced induction and yes, I think it would be one hell of a monster, and likely way more reliable. And that was my point.
#29
http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=11829
Made a general thread about it in the 2005-2011 Forum.
#30
It did exactly as I predicted, about 5-7 lbs. of boost, major decrease in spark advance, and lower than expected torque output. My guess was dead on.