Boss 302
08-14-2010, 02:23 PM
#51
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 204
Only thing is about this car is, I know everyone is praising the "track performance" but I guess I might just have to take a poll on this forum to see how many take their car to the track(not drag) on a weekly/monthly/semi-annually/annually basis because basically what you will pay for in this car besides the unique/rarity of the "Boss" you might as well get A. GT and upgrade for the same price and get more or B. Buy a GT500 :/
08-14-2010, 02:50 PM
#52
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 605
I go to the track just about every month, thats my reasoning for LOVING this car. the sturdier higher revving engine with an adjustable suspension from the factory is just fantastic for a track junkie like me.
08-15-2010, 06:31 AM
#55
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 204
Nothing too it but to do it, but I bet it will still have within the same power as a boosted GT :/ still not impressed, but they even stated the only reason they had to beef up the internals was for 500rpm extra to the red line to be like the old high revving boss, so gotta ask yourself how much did they beef it up?
08-15-2010, 10:28 AM
#56
Join Date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 23
I honestly don't think competing with the Mustang is too much of a worry for BMW. Just doesn't seem like a comparison they tend to make. But perhaps that will change. Now, I have heard that the next incarnations of the M3's will be reverting to 6 cylinders but with forced induction.
This is what we want.
I don't want the expense of a BMW or the maintenance costs. I like the simple, durable, reliable, fast, fun Mustang.
I can pay cash for an M3. I just don't want to.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
