Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

We as a collective are not on the same page with MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2010, 02:29 PM
  #31  
2007 grimlock stang
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2007 grimlock stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 110
Default

To put an end to the pointless post-posters: Seriously? HAHA! C'mon, enjoy life and your fellow Mustang enthusiasts my brothers and don't let harmless/uninteresting (to you) topics get one over on you. We're here to enjoy, discuss, and celebrate one of the most radically awesome automobiles in like, forever, right? :P

Personally, I love reading discussions like this. My point counts too! I want representation!
2007 grimlock stang is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 02:33 PM
  #32  
Cal26Stang
5th Gear Member
 
Cal26Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,201
Default

I was really hoping my longtube headers would get me better gas mileage...lol...jk
Cal26Stang is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 02:54 PM
  #33  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
Hard to prove 'significant' with reasonable numbers.

Driving 100 miles/week, the difference between getting 16.7 mpg and 20 is one gallon. $3 or less. ...Take you 3 weeks to get a movie ticket (and then another 3 weeks for hers). Etc.

Norm
Funny you should mention that and compare that to the price of fuel. Goods and services have inflated in price big time where fuel costs have either inflated less than or just about the same as the Federally calculated inflation rate (at least I think they have).

Movie tickets on the other hand have over-inflated in price. So have many more other goods and services. International trade (trade with China, etc.) is always argued to keep inflation prices in check, especially if the prices are inflating to fill some body's pockets with larger profit margins. For example, a product costs $2 to make in China. even after factoring overhead, the fuel burned by the ship, the trucks and trains to send it to the store, the product should probably cost $5 per unit.

The reason why the product which is so damn cheap to make in China is so overinflated is because of too many middle men coming into play. A distributor steps in between the factory and the store, and tacks on another $3 to that price. And if that middle man-distributor is a crook, he will work in ANOTHER distributor buddy in between himself and the store. So now two middle men are getting paid and the product price has more than doubled even factoring shipping, manufacturing cost and overhead.

So, yes, saving only $3 per week because of fuel savings does not make a difference to one individual person. It only makes a difference id EVERYONE is doing it, and it is not a monetary gain, it is for the sake of dumping less pollution into the air, keeping fuel prices in somewhat of a check by not putting less of a stress on the national fuel supply, etc.

Getting back to the individual saving a significant amount of money for observing MPG, and tying back why I mentioned over inflated prices, if the middle men were cut out, or at least the amount of money wasted on them is reduced to a fair level, then the $3 savings for saving gas will make a more meaningful difference to individual.

My weird and twisted point in this twisted logic is:
Maybe we should put our unified, cooperative, and collaborative efforts into driving prices down of overinflated product prices instead of worrying about MPG.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 02:58 PM
  #34  
chain1
4th Gear Member
 
chain1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,454
Default

This thread is painful. I can't believe I just read through it.
chain1 is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 03:06 PM
  #35  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Painful for some, but interesting for others. I personally find the whole thread, every aspect of it, very entertaining. From the guys who demand better MPG from a V8 performance car to the others who are bothered that someone would dare ask such a question. I find it very funny (not "funny" as in baffling, but "funny" as it make me laugh like at a joke) that the some guys are are all saying the same thing "What is the purpose of this useless thread/post?"
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 03:11 PM
  #36  
GTjoe49
2nd Gear Member
 
GTjoe49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 337
Default

In any conversation regarding a Mustang, MPG's are about as relevent as how loud your sound system will play...nice to know, but who cares???? LOL
GTjoe49 is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 03:14 PM
  #37  
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
howarmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IN
Posts: 16,087
Default

locktite applied
howarmat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerrytubes
2005-2014 Mustangs
2
10-23-2015 12:11 PM
8lug
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
2
09-21-2015 01:33 PM
Stainless Works
Street/Strip
0
09-17-2015 03:22 PM
Jb145700
General Tech
7
09-11-2015 12:28 PM
algregory
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
4
09-11-2015 11:44 AM



Quick Reply: We as a collective are not on the same page with MPG



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 PM.