Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ProCharger 2011 Mustang V6 coming soon!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2011, 11:03 PM
  #11  
a_guerrajr
1st Gear Member
 
a_guerrajr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by snaf2u
I`ll take 475 at the flywheel and be perfectly happy with that. That should put the v6 a little over 400 at wheels. Sounds good to me.
at a 15% drivetrain loss yes.

but just to be on the safe side. some headers and full exhaust system should be enough to bump it to over 400 incase there is a 18% loss.

and right now the average is 17-18% loss.
a_guerrajr is offline  
Old 01-13-2011, 12:59 AM
  #12  
bmwlover0725
 
bmwlover0725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 36
Default

This is what I've been waiting for since I got it. Thank god it's finally here! Can't wait to see how this works. Will definitely be considering
bmwlover0725 is offline  
Old 01-13-2011, 08:09 AM
  #13  
NzYme
 
NzYme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 46
Default

Question for you guys: What's the difference between this and something like the Whipple or the M90 superchargers?
NzYme is offline  
Old 01-13-2011, 09:40 AM
  #14  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by Alec
475hp V6? Jeez that will shut these V8 elitists up
Aint that the truth! The only way for a V8, even the 5.0 Coyote, to trump that is to go blown too!
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 01-13-2011, 10:50 PM
  #15  
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Diabolical!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,491
Default

Originally Posted by NzYme
Question for you guys: What's the difference between this and something like the Whipple or the M90 superchargers?
Procharger=Centrifugal (Also vortech, paxton, etc.)

Whipple=Twin Screw (Also Kenne Bell, Saleen)

M90=Roots (Also Edelbrock, Magnacharger, Roush, Eaton, Xcharger, etc.)

A centri is like a turbo, but spools off of the belt. It increases HP and TQ with RPMs. Twin screws and roots are both positive displacement, but a twin screw creates boost in the housing and feeds it into the combustion chambers while a roots force feeds air into the combustion chambers. Twin screws and roots both tend to make almost all of their usable HP and torque at lower RPMs and remain high across the band with roots tending to drop off at the very highest RPMs. Twin screws and centrifugals tend to run cooler than roots. (That's the not-so-Mr-Wizard summary.)

Last edited by Diabolical!; 01-13-2011 at 10:52 PM.
Diabolical! is offline  
Old 01-13-2011, 11:22 PM
  #16  
pdonket
4th Gear Member
 
pdonket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,846
Default

Originally Posted by JIM5.0
Aint that the truth! The only way for a V8, even the 5.0 Coyote, to trump that is to go blown too!
Well, if 475 is crank, to be honest I think you could top that on the coyote without going blown. Say you have a tune and CAI, people are posting 380rwhp or so, and assuming that's about 17% loss, you'd be at about 458 at the crank. If you threw on some LT headers and a new exhaust setup I think you'd be over 475 crank easily. And IMO CAI, tune, and exhaust isn't even that extensive an N/A setup. You could of course also throw in cams too to boost those numbers even further.


Nevertheless though, that's some crazy *** HP on a sixxer. I'm impressed! Although I do wonder how well those blocks will hold up under 475hp over time just as I wonder about blown coyotes.
pdonket is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 12:55 AM
  #17  
tigercrazy718
4th Gear Member
 
tigercrazy718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,731
Default

that is mind blowingly huge. i cant wait to see some of these
tigercrazy718 is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 05:46 AM
  #18  
LostBoyz
4th Gear Member
 
LostBoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,292
Default

Originally Posted by pdonket
Well, if 475 is crank, to be honest I think you could top that on the coyote without going blown. Say you have a tune and CAI, people are posting 380rwhp or so, and assuming that's about 17% loss, you'd be at about 458 at the crank. If you threw on some LT headers and a new exhaust setup I think you'd be over 475 crank easily. And IMO CAI, tune, and exhaust isn't even that extensive an N/A setup. You could of course also throw in cams too to boost those numbers even further.


Nevertheless though, that's some crazy *** HP on a sixxer. I'm impressed! Although I do wonder how well those blocks will hold up under 475hp over time just as I wonder about blown coyotes.
Then you could put LTs and cams on the v6 and...

This is a fun game to play
LostBoyz is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 10:40 AM
  #19  
07 Stang
6th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 6,409
Default

Originally Posted by LostBoyz
Then you could put LTs and cams on the v6 and...

This is a fun game to play
Yep!
What will be interesting is the cost difference between an EcoBoost V6 and a 5.0.
07 Stang is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 10:47 AM
  #20  
pdonket
4th Gear Member
 
pdonket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,846
Default

Originally Posted by LostBoyz
Then you could put LTs and cams on the v6 and...

This is a fun game to play
I'm not saying you couldn't beat an N/A V8 with a blown V6 even if the V8 has upgrades, I was just countering his point that technically you could get above 475 crank HP on a coyote without going blown.

I have no intention of starting a V6 vs V8 war
pdonket is offline  


Quick Reply: ProCharger 2011 Mustang V6 coming soon!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.