Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Magnaflow # 16574 vs. Bassani # 4610 SR5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2011, 06:50 PM
  #1  
emilyk2004
Thread Starter
 
emilyk2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27
Default Magnaflow # 16574 vs. Bassani # 4610 SR5

I KNOW EVERYONE IS PROBABLY TIRED OF EXHAUST QUESTIONS, BUT I NEED SOME HELP TRYING TO DETERMINE WHICH AXLE BACK SYSTEM TO BUY. I HAVE A 2010 GT , I'M TIRED OF LISTENING TO YOU TUBE CLIPS, THEY MOSTLY SOUND THE SAME. I THINK I HAVE NARROWED IT DOWN BETWEEN MAGNAFLOW # 16574 AND BASSANI # 4610 SR5 ... ANY BODY HAVE ANY EXPERIENCE WITH EITHER PRODUCT ? ANY INFO IS APPRECIATED !!!
emilyk2004 is offline  
Old 03-25-2011, 02:18 AM
  #2  
smokestang
3rd Gear Member
 
smokestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: N.J
Posts: 688
Default

Out of the 2, id go with the magnaflow. i have the magnapack catback and love the sound...although i also have the catted X , so its a bit louder than the stock H pipe, but they sound really throaty and very deep!
smokestang is offline  
Old 03-25-2011, 09:10 AM
  #3  
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
baddog671's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MD/WV
Posts: 5,736
Default

I just put Magnaflows on my car, although I'm not sure which model they are, and was alittle dissapointed with the results. Alittle deeper tone at low rpms, and a bit more deeper around 3-4k rpms, but overall, loudness is the same or even slightly more muffled. May have different results with a more modified engine though, or especially once the midpipe or headers have been changed
baddog671 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
07-26-2016 01:20 PM
Vrooom
4.6L General Discussion
13
02-21-2016 05:25 PM
dubarado
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
6
12-23-2015 01:16 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
09-20-2015 11:32 AM



Quick Reply: Magnaflow # 16574 vs. Bassani # 4610 SR5



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.