fastautos

All of the Iacocca Mustangs built were supposed to be silver, but apparently the did one in red and one in black. What do you guys think of the red? Better than the silver?

http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2011/0...ition-mustang/

chain1

That's pretty horrendous looking.

05xrunner

+1254423

Alec

I like it SLIGHTLY more than the silver, and that's not saying much. $90k? Dream on

BWfVA

Both of them look about the same I guess I like the red more because its different, but I not really a big fan of them anyway.

pdonket

Really don't like it. Just looks fugly to me.

floridafordguy

Well, it may be hideous, but at least it's expensive

HT

I don't understand what is going on with that car...it looks regular, but just awful. It's like they just screwed up the lines on the front end...idk why it gives such an awful impression though...

Is it just my eyes telling me that the front end looks squished downward? The rear is pretty hideous too, but the front is just screwing with me.

The hard top 5.0 link at the bottom of that page is pretty awful looking as well. Cool concept...awful product.

CincyGT2009

I don't get the $90,000 sticker (other than exclusivity just for its own sake), but I really would have liked to see the 2010 move in this fastback direction, rather than the way it went...

jAAAmes

so other than being the fugliest mustang ever, whats so special about it?