Top Gear episode - Shelby vs Roush
#1
Top Gear episode - Shelby vs Roush
Watching Top Gear yesterday, (dang those guys are hollarious!) where the boys test drove a GT500 (probably an 2009 episode). One of the comments that caught my attention was that the Roush had better suspension, and the GT500 lacked suspension upgrades due to costs. Is this still the case in 2012 and 2013? Does Roush truly outperform Shelby?
#2
I watched that last night as well, it was also down about 100hp from the shelby, and still got a 2 sec better lap time.
The power of a well-balanced and applied suspension, can outweigh power itself..
The power of a well-balanced and applied suspension, can outweigh power itself..
#7
gt500 looked sloppy and apparently felt sloppy
#8
To each their own though, certainly. However I prefer my car to be able to handle and put that power to the ground, and not have the rear end wagging in the air when I brake, or worrying about excessive body roll in turns throwing my weight-balance ratios off.. Take it to the curves where some skill and performance are both needed. You could throw a drunk guy behind the wheel and go straight.. (well sorta..) The fact that Roush built a car that gets 2 secs up on a Shelby with 100hp on it (on a small 1:30 average track setup), says right there it's 'not' all about straight line flooring.. 2 secs is a 'lot' for a small track like that, and 2 secs is 'forever' when you are talking straight line..
They (Euro Top Gear) never have much good to say about Mustangs due to the SRA anyhow. All opinions aside - the episode in discussion was years old, and today's Shelby isn't the one he drove at all. Engine and suspension-wise the differences from the 05-09 to the 10-12 (and now 13) Shelbys are substantial, so it's sorta a moot point.