Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2010 GT or 2012 GT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2012, 10:38 AM
  #21  
Andy13186
4th Gear Member
 
Andy13186's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,792
Default

Originally Posted by Tanner05
I would get a 4.6 without a doubt. The 5.0 is an awesome transmission, but the issues with the transmission cancel out the awesomenes of the motor for me. This is coming from someone with an '05 V6 that has the T5 (which is known for having a **** transmission) It is not easy to fix that kind of issue. A pain in the *** and a lot of money.

My husband's buddy has a '10 4.6 with a few mods that car is great with a solid drive-train.
The 5.0's transmissions have no issues usually and are superior. Also the 5.0 will have a powertrain warrantee anyway and the 2010 will most likely be out of warrantee.

Last edited by Andy13186; 10-27-2012 at 05:42 PM.
Andy13186 is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 11:57 AM
  #22  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

The 2010 4.6L is about 270 RWHP. The 5.0L is about 360 RWHP.
Nuke is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 11:59 AM
  #23  
stangmust
 
stangmust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 1
Default

I view the 2010 GT as more of a cruiser and the 2012 GT as more of a sport bike. Torque difference between the years is not as dramatic as the horsepower difference. The superior gearing of a 6 speed amplifies the performance difference between the engines. The incidence level of MT82 problems is blown out of proportion, but I can also say that I've had my 2010 for a couple of years and never regretted choosing a 2010 over 2011. I prefer the slightly more conservative fascias of a 2010, prefer the sound of the 2010 GT, and even prefer the proven Tremec 5 speed to a new skip shift 6 speed for laid back drives. Also I bought a convertible and do not care for the rear convertible seats after 2010.
stangmust is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 02:29 PM
  #24  
bakerjd
5th Gear Member
 
bakerjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,874
Default

Originally Posted by Nuke
The 2010 4.6L is about 270 RWHP. The 5.0L is about 360 RWHP.
I think this explains why I am still waiting for Ashton Kutcher to pop out of nowhere with a trucker hat on.
bakerjd is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 02:53 PM
  #25  
07BLACKGT
5th Gear Member
 
07BLACKGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,935
Default

The 4.6 is a very reliable motor as are the transmissions in the 05-10's.

However the 5.0 is not even comparable to the 4.6 IMO. The technology in the new 5.0 and the way to revs is amaaaaaaaazing. Very similar to the newer M3's 4.0 V8, except with more torque and doesn't rev quite as high (stock) With a few bolt-on's to the 5.0 you will be running with some serious competition.
07BLACKGT is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 05:22 PM
  #26  
Shadow7874
4th Gear Member
 
Shadow7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Henry County, Georgia
Posts: 1,636
Default

If it were me id go with the 5.0
I love my 2007 but man the 5.0s are sick.
I would get a 2011 if it were me. Slightly cheaper but still the 5.0
And some of the newer 2013s/2012s are getting a little tacky imo with all of the changes they are adding. A lot of it is options like the louvers, scoops, lights etc but the oem options are fairly ugly to me.
Not to mention the new 5.0 runs with the new M3 so you can get all the performance for half the price!
Shadow7874 is offline  
Old 10-28-2012, 10:16 AM
  #27  
nj07
2nd Gear Member
 
nj07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 434
Default

2010 the motor has no issues and definatly not the trans and believe me unless the new 5.0 is supercharged modded 4.6's like mine give bolt on 5.0's a run believe me and if you are looking to spend money on a 5.0 buy a used gt 500 with definatly a better trans and a name on that car that will really keep better value!
nj07 is offline  
Old 10-29-2012, 12:55 PM
  #28  
solaratomic
2nd Gear Member
 
solaratomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Gump, Alabama
Posts: 240
Default

I've owned both and in all honesty the 4.6L and tremec are bulletproof. The only trouble I had were ticking phasers. It was a fun car. I also had a coworker that had 165K on his 4.6L & tremec with minimal problems. The 5.0L/MT-82 is yet to be seen. However in all honesty the 5.0L @ half throttle = 4.6L @ full throttle. If you drive them back to back you'll buy the 5.0L and not look back. The only thing else I can say is don't buy a 2011 if you can help it and the later the production of a 12 the better. Ford isn't the best for testing so it takes them about a year to iron stuff out. (I was told this by a major Ford dealership service manager)
solaratomic is offline  
Old 10-29-2012, 09:42 PM
  #29  
2011CoYoTe
 
2011CoYoTe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
Default

I just got me a 2011 gt premium 6 speed and I am in love with it. Only paid 22 for it. I think either way you choose its a win win situation.. Lol its a great car can't wait to start modding it.. Good luck with your choice.
2011CoYoTe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
04-29-2019 02:56 PM
zsmart
Convertible Tech
2
02-29-2016 08:33 AM
shrkbate
2010-current S197 Appearance Section
3
10-02-2015 08:25 PM
Webster454
2005-2014 Mustangs
1
09-07-2015 04:59 AM



Quick Reply: 2010 GT or 2012 GT?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.