MustangForums.com

MustangForums.com (https://mustangforums.com/forum/index.php)
-   2005-2014 Mustangs (https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005-2014-mustangs-43/)
-   -   side scoops? (https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005-2014-mustangs/711222-side-scoops.html)

RenGen 06-23-2014 10:24 AM

side scoops?
 
Been thinking of getting these:

http://www.americanmuscle.com/mustan...coop-0509.html

they are the best looking ones IMO, I feel like the side of my car looks too stock, and I'm not really a fan of quarter window louvers.

What do you think of them? I'm hoping they will add more curves and aesthetics to my car.

feejay 06-23-2014 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by RenGen (Post 8401559)
Been thinking of getting these:

http://www.americanmuscle.com/mustan...coop-0509.html

they are the best looking ones IMO, I feel like the side of my car looks too stock, and I'm not really a fan of quarter window louvers.

What do you think of them? I'm hoping they will add more curves and aesthetics to my car.

Non functional = no

RenGen 06-23-2014 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by feejay (Post 8401565)
Non functional = no

anything else you'd recommend for the sides of the car? or best to keep it stock/clean?

feejay 06-23-2014 10:43 AM


Originally Posted by RenGen (Post 8401567)
anything else you'd recommend for the sides of the car? or best to keep it stock/clean?

I agree that it's a little plain, but I haven't seen any side scoops that don't look like they were just slapped on for decoration. If those are my choices, I would stick with stock.

Pulled off the quarter window louvers that were on mine when I bought it for the same reason.

TheDivaDanielle 06-23-2014 10:47 AM

of all the side scoops available for the mustang, those are easily the ugliest.

OEM style or nothing at all.

Cruzinaround 06-23-2014 01:00 PM

A non-functional ornamental only retro look? BLEh.

If ford made an actual channel in the fender well that worked with a brake cooling upgrade kit so that side scoop could serve some purpose....Maybe. As is the only purpose it serves is to add drag.

TheDivaDanielle 06-23-2014 01:30 PM

didn't it like never serve a purpose ever? even on the early cars?

Cruzinaround 06-23-2014 01:39 PM


Originally Posted by TheDivaDanielle (Post 8401629)
didn't it like never serve a purpose ever? even on the early cars?

It was a functional cooling duct on some Shelby's back in the day. Anything afterwards has been trying to imitate that classic look but, certainly not functional.

There was a Televised custom earlier s197 build up of a Carrol Shelby commissioned 800+HP supercharged street-able Mustang where they actually performed the work required to make the duct functional. While Carrol Shelby was still alive. If I can track down the show and episode I'll share it here.

I remember them even saying in the show WTF is the reason for having it if it doesn't work except to add unnecessary drag?

Boom
---

TheDivaDanielle 06-23-2014 01:43 PM

it's common all the time on vehicles, GTOs, firebirds, camaros, mustangs, X5, I can think of many cars over the years that had some stuff added to them that was available from the factory that implied a look that never did anything. One of the funnier examples I can think of is the 82-84 Z/28. In '84 the duct work was sealed. in prior years, functional. No real reason why they removed it. That carried into the IROCs which had louvers that were sealed, and Trans Am's with hoods with vents up front and the sides that had no purpose.

Cruzinaround 06-23-2014 02:02 PM

Here it is Diva....this is a Link to an Article about it...The car was actually commisioned by Carrol Shelby himself from West Coast Customs. For a limited run of 25 custom built Mustangs.

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...ustoms-team-up


Here's a Youtube clip of the video segment


Just Saying...
---


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands