END OF DEBATE BETWEEN DIABLO AND SCT
#31
RE: END OF DEBATE BETWEEN DIABLO AND SCT
ORIGINAL: allfyre
That's it, "We want Thunderdome!"
That's it, "We want Thunderdome!"
#32
RE: END OF DEBATE BETWEEN DIABLO AND SCT
What are you planning on doing about the fuel system? I know the guys over at MMFF are planning on doing dual pumps and 60# injectors for now, but will ultimatly swap it out for a return style system.
#33
RE: END OF DEBATE BETWEEN DIABLO AND SCT
There is another thing i was thinking about. Now i cant tell you what one is better, but i can tell you a few more advantages of the SCT. I was reading a bit ago about someone with the predator monitoring a/f but he could not have it match up with his rpm's, he could log one or the other....now i may be wrong ( or should i say, he just didnt have his software down ) but, with the xcal2 i can datalog virtually EVERY parameter at once. Meaning i can have a/f AND rpm on the same chart to get an idea @ what rpm im going lean or rich...just a thought to the weekend racer. The SCT also has analog inputs if you want to use a w/b a/f solution...im not sure if the predator does that.
#34
RE: END OF DEBATE BETWEEN DIABLO AND SCT
I have SCT and I'd be damn if I going to purchase a diablo now . I have spent the money on the SCT and it is just going to have to be that way for a while better or worse.
#35
RE: END OF DEBATE BETWEEN DIABLO AND SCT
If you think about it, there are a finite number of commands the computer is going to accept. Therefore from a hardware perspective, neither unit is going to be able to exceed the programing capabilities of the other. Additional features such as data logging aside, it really comes down to cost, which interface do you prefer, the service you get from the retailer and how good your tuner is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post