Does 2011 Must. rear view of car remind you of...
01-12-2011, 06:18 PM
#1
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ca
Posts: 51
Does 2011 Must. rear view of car remind you of...
My first impression with the concave rear panel on 2011 and light design looks more 67-68-69 than
say the 1970 Boss appearance which I expect stopped in 2010?
Actually growing on me now , who else
used to it by now. Some nice aftermarket era panels are available ,and hide the concave look -if thats what you're after...
my self may do the "magnetic slap on" black out semi gloss black overlay....
If the rear were just 1 1/2 lower.....
say the 1970 Boss appearance which I expect stopped in 2010?
Actually growing on me now , who else
used to it by now. Some nice aftermarket era panels are available ,and hide the concave look -if thats what you're after...
my self may do the "magnetic slap on" black out semi gloss black overlay....
If the rear were just 1 1/2 lower.....
01-13-2011, 12:42 AM
#2
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 505
Yup
Wasn't really feeling the 2010 look at first, but it slowly grew on me. It's more of a sporty look than a muscle look, but I can live with that
CDC blackout panel to fill it and 2-inch drop in rear. I really wished CDC would make its panel fill it up completely. But as you can see in the picture, there will be a small space exposed on both sides if you center it. It's really not that noticeable when directly in rear.
Wasn't really feeling the 2010 look at first, but it slowly grew on me. It's more of a sporty look than a muscle look, but I can live with that
CDC blackout panel to fill it and 2-inch drop in rear. I really wished CDC would make its panel fill it up completely. But as you can see in the picture, there will be a small space exposed on both sides if you center it. It's really not that noticeable when directly in rear.
01-13-2011, 07:06 AM
#4
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Clinton, Tennessee
Posts: 761
I was not crazy about the rear when it first came out but loved the front end, but after seeing it around, it as a package looks good.
I am sure in some engineers mind the concave rear was supposed to do something, but to me even the OTT stripes helped out with the look.
I am sure in some engineers mind the concave rear was supposed to do something, but to me even the OTT stripes helped out with the look.
01-14-2011, 05:07 AM
#6
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Clinton, Tennessee
Posts: 761
I have seen a Shelby or 2 with the Colorado Red and a couple of GT's with the Matte Black OTT stripe, 1 had the Fords rear deck panel on it, they all looked awesome.
01-14-2011, 05:21 AM
#7
I was not crazy about the rear when it first came out but loved the front end, but after seeing it around, it as a package looks good.
I am sure in some engineers mind the concave rear was supposed to do something, but to me even the OTT stripes helped out with the look.
I am sure in some engineers mind the concave rear was supposed to do something, but to me even the OTT stripes helped out with the look.
01-14-2011, 12:36 PM
#8
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nevada
Posts: 544
Yup
Wasn't really feeling the 2010 look at first, but it slowly grew on me. It's more of a sporty look than a muscle look, but I can live with that
CDC blackout panel to fill it and 2-inch drop in rear. I really wished CDC would make its panel fill it up completely. But as you can see in the picture, there will be a small space exposed on both sides if you center it. It's really not that noticeable when directly in rear.
Wasn't really feeling the 2010 look at first, but it slowly grew on me. It's more of a sporty look than a muscle look, but I can live with that
CDC blackout panel to fill it and 2-inch drop in rear. I really wished CDC would make its panel fill it up completely. But as you can see in the picture, there will be a small space exposed on both sides if you center it. It's really not that noticeable when directly in rear.
