2005-2009 GT vs. 2011 V6 - Page 2 - MustangForums.com

Notices
3.7L V6 Technical Discussions Any questions about the new engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

2005-2009 GT vs. 2011 V6

Closed Thread

 
 
 
Old 03-01-2010, 05:00 PM
  #11  
scapegoat
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by 05gtdriver View Post
I'm sure with the closer geared 6speed stick the '11 V-6 will surprise some sleeping '05-'09 GT drivers, but you gotta remember, the '11 V-6 gets dual exhaust, the 8.8 lsd diff and I'm sure the new 6speed has to weigh a lil more than the outgoing 5speed in the older GT. The weight difference probably isn't more than 100lb(I've seen specs where a 2011 V-6 weighs over 3600lb, more than the '05-'09 GT), so who knows at this point. Funny thing, most '05-'09 GTs dyno around 265-270rwhp stock, that's really around 307-311 flywheel hp. Until an '11 V-6 is strapped to a dyno, we won't know the whole story. As to a concept that an '11 V-6 can be "tuned" to higher hp levels without going FI will be a mystery to me as the car is already highly tuned from the factory. A '05-'09 GT can be "bolted up" to produce around 295-310rwhp(which equates to 330-340ish hp at the flywheel). I think the 2011 V-6 was long overdue(as was the 5.0L GT!) and the breed continues to improve, we all win . As to which car to get? If I was a young man(under 25) I'd say the V-6(for insurance purposes and the younger crowd seems to enjoy the "latest thing out"), but for an older person(as me) I'd rather have an older V-8 model, I was raised with muscle cars and Mustang is a V-8 car IMO. No offense to any non-V-8 owners, but that's my opinion.............
Originally Posted by machracer11 View Post
I could not agree more! even as a younger guy (21) I would take my older v8 over a newer equally as powerful v6 any day of the week. Performance is a big deal and all but nothing has the swagger of a roaring american V8!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and shoot i can get a couple bolt-on's and be good to go haha

exactly. if anyone was given the choice between a 4.6l v8 and the new v6 of equal power... you'd be a fool to choose the v6. they're producing amazing numbers with the v6 coming out, but it just isn't the same without 8 cylinders under the hood, regardless of the power output
scapegoat is offline  
Old 03-01-2010, 05:53 PM
  #12  
PNYXPRESS
5th Gear Member
 
PNYXPRESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 2,952
Default

Originally Posted by swat 79 View Post
That must suck for the 05-09 gts, a v-6 with more hp then their v8?
This is nothing new. The 4.0L v6 had nearly the same hp as the outgoing 5.0l in 1995. It will only be a matter of time when the emisson standards change again and the gt will be back to 200 hp and the v6 will be pushing a measley 140hp.
PNYXPRESS is offline  
Old 03-01-2010, 06:06 PM
  #13  
05gtdriver
5th Gear Member
 
05gtdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles Ca
Posts: 2,127
Default

Originally Posted by PNYXPRESS View Post
This is nothing new. The 4.0L v6 had nearly the same hp as the outgoing 5.0l in 1995. It will only be a matter of time when the emisson standards change again and the gt will be back to 200 hp and the v6 will be pushing a measley 140hp.
LMAO! Very true, it could happen............
05gtdriver is offline  
Old 03-01-2010, 06:56 PM
  #14  
Lax07
2nd Gear Member
 
Lax07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 465
Default

I could see the new 3.7L doing 0-60 around 5.7-5.8... Fords just making sure it wins against camaro and challenger V6 models
Lax07 is offline  
Old 03-01-2010, 09:11 PM
  #15  
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by PNYXPRESS View Post
This is nothing new. The 4.0L v6 had nearly the same hp as the outgoing 5.0l in 1995. It will only be a matter of time when the emisson standards change again and the gt will be back to 200 hp and the v6 will be pushing a measley 140hp.

True, that's why I plan to hold onto this v-8 for years to come! And plus 1, equal everything, i'll take a v-8 time and time again.
swat 79 is offline  
Old 03-01-2010, 11:24 PM
  #16  
Matafy
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 227
Default

Aren't the emission laws changing? I was reading somewhere I just don't remember what year.
Matafy is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 04:18 AM
  #17  
Gene K
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Decatur AL USA
Posts: 2,176
Default

4.236 Low Gear in the MT82 for the V6. That means the 2011 V6 w/ 3.31 is going to have an essentially equal launch ratio as a 2005-2009 GT with a 4.10. That will make up some of the torque issues. A limited slip rear axle is also standard (I suspect its an 8.8 although that has not been confirmed).

While peak power will be similar I suspect average power during the run (which is what gives you your ET) will be less for the 2011 V6 than a 2005+ GT. Im somewhat doubtful you will get a a stock 2011 V6 into the low 13's with a 2005+ GT I do expect it to run high 13's and give 1999-2004 GT's fits.
Gene K is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 07:54 AM
  #18  
07 Stang
6th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 6,331
Default

According to the latest April issue of Motor Trend on the 2011 V6;

Base Price $22,995
Engine 3.7L/305-hp/280-lb-ft DOCH 24 valve V-6
Curb Weight 3400 lb (est)
0-60 mph 5.8 sec. (MT est.)
EPA city/hwy fuel 18-19/29-30 (est)
07 Stang is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:16 AM
  #19  
jdmcbride
4th Gear Member
 
jdmcbride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Beach to South Carolina
Posts: 1,567
Default

Originally Posted by 07 Stang View Post
According to the latest April issue of Motor Trend on the 2011 V6;

Base Price $22,995
Engine 3.7L/305-hp/280-lb-ft DOCH 24 valve V-6
Curb Weight 3400 lb (est)
0-60 mph 5.8 sec. (MT est.)
EPA city/hwy fuel 18-19/29-30 (est)
Wow, the new V6 weighs 50 pounds more than my GT and weighs the same as a 2010 GT.

5.8 seconds 0-60 is about what I though it would be - a definite improvement on the 05-10 V6 though (just like the 2011 GT will be a definite improvement on the 05-10 GT).

...waiting on response from swat...

Last edited by jdmcbride; 03-08-2010 at 08:22 AM.
jdmcbride is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:50 AM
  #20  
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by jdmcbride View Post
Wow, the new V6 weighs 50 pounds more than my GT and weighs the same as a 2010 GT.


...waiting on response from swat...

http://mustangs.about.com/od/modelye...s-challeng.htm
2008 mustang gt curb weight 3540 (premium, auto)

http://autos.yahoo.com/2008_ford_mus...e_coupe-specs/
2008 mustang gt curb weight 3450 (deluxe, manual)


Now, there's plenty more to keep going, but you get the idea, stock, your car weighs 50 lbs MORE.


The v-6 Lbs per power is - 11.14
and the lbs per tq is- 12.14

The gt lbs per power is- 11.50
and the lbs per tq is- 10.78


While the v6 has a better power to weight ratio then the gt, the gt has a much better tq to weight ratio then the v-6. However as said earlier, the gearing on the v-6 will make up for that tq disadvantage. Now, after looking at that, if you really think that this car will do 0-60 in 5.8 seconds when the car is ready to be purchased, you got something else coming to you. 0-60 in 5.3-5.6 and the quarter mile in 13.9. It will not be faster then the 05-09's, however it will be breathing right down their necks, and close by the 10's.
swat 79 is offline  
Closed Thread
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Granatelli Sales
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
9
03-21-2016 06:16 PM
BeatnikFink
New Member Area
6
10-01-2015 08:00 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
09-20-2015 11:32 AM
dunebuggydude11
Want To Buy Ads
0
09-13-2015 03:03 PM

Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory