building a 393 specs
#4
RE: building a 393 specs
ORIGINAL: fishermanjesse
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
#6
RE: building a 393 specs
ORIGINAL: r.barn
393 is stock 351W crank with 302 pistons and longer rods.
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
ORIGINAL: fishermanjesse
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
Thanks Matt Paul
#7
RE: building a 393 specs
ORIGINAL: Matt Paul
Lets start over the most common why and the right way is a Scat 3.85 stroke crank,Stock 5.996 rods and a 302 piston.You dont use a stock crank R.Barn post your finds on that? if not stop giving out bad info you will fu*k up someones project.
Thanks Matt Paul
ORIGINAL: r.barn
393 is stock 351W crank with 302 pistons and longer rods.
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
ORIGINAL: fishermanjesse
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
Thanks Matt Paul
#8
RE: building a 393 specs
ORIGINAL: MadMan@TheWheel
That is actually the right information. Matt you are a good source of technical information, but no need to blast another member. Let's keep the peace.
ORIGINAL: Matt Paul
Lets start over the most common why and the right way is a Scat 3.85 stroke crank,Stock 5.996 rods and a 302 piston.You dont use a stock crank R.Barn post your finds on that? if not stop giving out bad info you will fu*k up someones project.
Thanks Matt Paul
ORIGINAL: r.barn
393 is stock 351W crank with 302 pistons and longer rods.
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
ORIGINAL: fishermanjesse
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
i heard that u could use the stock crank?
for the amount of money saved in keeping a stock crank when your
buying new rods and pistons and everything else already its silly.
You're only saving like $250, and risking a $5k+ motor? doesnt make much sense
Thanks Matt Paul
And to make it with stock stroke, you'd need a 4.23" bore.
#9
RE: building a 393 specs
351W to a 393 Ford Stroker Kit:
Performance Street Kit up to 500 HP
Block: Stock 351W Ford Block 4.030 bore
Kit specifications and standard components:
Pistons:Forged flat top
Connecting Rods: Scat 5.955 I Beam, full float bushed pin
Crankshaft: Scat 9000 Series 3.850 stroke 351W 3.000 main 2.311 rod journal
Now maybe we can put this to rest...Yes?
Performance Street Kit up to 500 HP
Block: Stock 351W Ford Block 4.030 bore
Kit specifications and standard components:
Pistons:Forged flat top
Connecting Rods: Scat 5.955 I Beam, full float bushed pin
Crankshaft: Scat 9000 Series 3.850 stroke 351W 3.000 main 2.311 rod journal
Now maybe we can put this to rest...Yes?