351 Mustang

351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2007, 10:37 AM
  #11  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

how much do you plan on spending on heads just an idea?
w8less is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 03:54 PM
  #12  
rallycar01
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
rallycar01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 52
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller???

like i said im not sure. it doesn't matter about cost though with the entire project or the heads with that matter. I know i am getting a great deal on all my parts but untill i go and pick it up i don't know the parts list yet. so untill then i wont really have an idea. But back to the entire first question. if you want to go that fast say 600+ rhp why do some people choose roller and some not???? i was told stay away from it, but just a question.
rallycar01 is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:58 PM
  #13  
r.barn
6th Gear Member
 
r.barn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,263
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

Your guy is probably not saying not to go roller.
He's saying not to go "hydraulic" roller.

Hydraulic roller cams are not as stable at high rpms as a solid roller cam and wont handle as aggressive cam profiles
600rwhp 408W will need to spin up to 6,500-7,000rpm and run like 14-15:1 compression on race gas.
Solid cams are better for this. You're pushing the limits of this engine into a true "race" engine
Hydraulic roller cams are just more street friendly.

Trust me, he's not going to use a flat tappet cam, which is what everyone is
trying to get away from when they do a "roller conversion"

You're still putting a better cam in there, you're just taking it beyond what most people do.

Its more of a thing where some people put hydraulic roller cams in and some want to eek every bit
of power out and use a solid roller cam.
Flat tappet cams that were stock are old school tech and require proper break-in, wear issues
and more friction involved, so make a little less power.
r.barn is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:06 PM
  #14  
uedlose
5th Gear Member
 
uedlose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charles Town WV
Posts: 2,288
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

^^^^^^ I was thinking the same thing. its gone to be a roller just not a Hyd.roller
uedlose is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 10:32 PM
  #15  
89Ford
4th Gear Member
 
89Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,250
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

some one should post a picture of both lifters so he gets a better idea as to why one is better than the other. it all makes sense when you see the difference
89Ford is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 10:52 PM
  #16  
r.barn
6th Gear Member
 
r.barn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,263
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

ORIGINAL: 89Ford

some one should post a picture of both lifters so he gets a better idea as to why one is better than the other. it all makes sense when you see the difference
Solid lifter ....... no springs inside


Hydraulic Roller . has springs


Flat tappet that is the old stock type lifter, does not have the little roller on the end
that rides on the cam, and hence robs power from the extra friction
r.barn is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 11:08 PM
  #17  
89Ford
4th Gear Member
 
89Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,250
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

i meant a flat tappet and roller so he could see the clear difference. I know a few guys that took automotive classes and didnt know.
89Ford is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 11:21 AM
  #18  
irish1
2nd Gear Member
 
irish1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 371
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

I thought the general rule of thumb was not to exceed 400 rwhp by much on a stock block 302, or 600ish on a stock block 351W. If you want more, an aftermarket block may be the only way to go. My 2 cents
Matt
irish1 is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 07:31 PM
  #19  
MadMan@TheWheel
4th Gear Member
 
MadMan@TheWheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Great State Of Texas
Posts: 1,062
Default RE: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller

If you want a picture a flat tappet then picture the roller lifter sans roller and a flat bottom
MadMan@TheWheel is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2007StangV6
2005-2014 Mustangs
30
01-28-2016 06:09 PM
bconboy
2005-2014 Mustangs
16
09-21-2015 12:52 PM
mustangchef
New Member Area
7
09-04-2015 08:08 PM
TimeLord101
New Member Area
3
09-04-2015 09:27 AM
raleigh05GTO
New Member Area
5
09-04-2015 07:09 AM



Quick Reply: 351W roller??? whats the big deal?? why go roller or change the strongest 69 block into a roller???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.