3:73 or 4:10
#21
RE: 3:73 or 4:10
with 4.10s in either tranny you will still get about the same milage as a stock GT (-1-3 mpg)
btw you will need a limited slip as well, i would recomend the detroit true trac as it doesnt use clutches
http://www.drivetrainspecialists.com...-75/index.html
btw you will need a limited slip as well, i would recomend the detroit true trac as it doesnt use clutches
http://www.drivetrainspecialists.com...-75/index.html
#22
RE: 3:73 or 4:10
ORIGINAL: scrming
you are thinking of GT's...
ORIGINAL: Pimpin Pony
I was pretty sure that there was a difference between the manuals and the autos. I thought the autos came with 3.55s and the manuals came with 3.31s?
I was pretty sure that there was a difference between the manuals and the autos. I thought the autos came with 3.55s and the manuals came with 3.31s?
#24
RE: 3:73 or 4:10
ORIGINAL: HurricaneStang
Is the True Trac better then t-lok? It's like $200 more then t-lok lol is there any better of an advantage with it?
Is the True Trac better then t-lok? It's like $200 more then t-lok lol is there any better of an advantage with it?
#26
RE: 3:73 or 4:10
Are you sure that it was the other way around? I thought when I read it (wherever I read it) it made sense to me because I thought of it as the 3.55 was making up for the fact that it was an auto and would automatically loose some on acceleration? Not saying that your wrong or anything, its just usually if I can associate it to something and it makes sense to me I remember it pretty well. It just seems like I was pretty sure about this.
#30
RE: 3:73 or 4:10
ORIGINAL: blackfoot
the deal with auto is that its hard on gas as it is compared to a manual.. so they put the smaller gearing in..
ill ook up the rear end ratios for the all 4 cars
the deal with auto is that its hard on gas as it is compared to a manual.. so they put the smaller gearing in..
ill ook up the rear end ratios for the all 4 cars
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post