4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

F-Body vs Mustang Comparison Chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2006, 11:27 AM
  #11  
angcobra
4th Gear Member
 
angcobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,724
Default RE: F-Body vs Mustang Comparison Chart

I think it is a good idea to build such a data base and maybe have it as a sticky or something. Thanks for your effort.
The problem as you see is people will always find a different source of info that conflicts and most folks will not have completely stock cars.
angcobra is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 11:44 AM
  #12  
1981gMachine
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
1981gMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 136
Default RE: F-Body vs Mustang Comparison Chart

Here is how one Magazine does it \/

Road Test Data - Automobile Magazine

TESTING PROCEDURES AND PHILOSOPHY


Equipment: VBOX II GPS-based system manufactured by Racelogic, Buckingham, England. (You can verify our results by buying your own at www.racelogic.co.uk for $11,800.) A Doppler shift applied to radio signals received from the US Department of Defense Global Positioning System satellites yields velocity, position, and other information which is recorded for analysis.

Vehicle state: Driver (no passengers), full fuel tank, break-in mileage.

Driver: In the interests of consistency and comparability, all formal testing is conducted by Don Sherman, Automobile Magazine's technical editor. He's been doing this for 34 years.

Acceleration test: Standing start with aggressive clutch engagement (vehicles equipped with manual transmission) or brake torque (vehicles equipped with automatic transmission). Traction and stability control systems are disabled when possible. An appropriate amount of wheel spin is encouraged to obtain peak performance. Lift-throttle up-shifts are rapidly executed with redlines observed. Drag strip "roll out" time and distance are NOT subtracted from published results.

Passing acceleration: With the transmission in third gear (manual-shift vehicles) or drive (automatic-equipped vehicles), and the vehicle cruising at 30mph, the time needed to accelerate to 70mph is measured. Corrections applied to all acceleration figures adjust results to standard weather conditions (60 degrees F, 29.92 in. mercury barometric pressure).

Braking: A pressure switch located on the brake pedal initiates recording of activation speed, deceleration rate, and distance information. Braking distance is mathematically adjusted to a 70-mph initiation speed. The deceleration rate reported is the peak g's measured during a stop.

Cornering: The test car is accelerated to the adhesion limit on a 400-foot-diameter skid pad circle. The peak g's reported are the averages observed during one-second intervals in each direction.

Speed in gears: The maximum observed velocity without exceeding the engine's redline rpm.

Philosophy: Automobile tests cars for a variety of reasons. While many makers offer a few snippets of acceleration, top-speed, and gas-mileage information, many do not. Conducting our own tests fills in gaps and adds trustworthy information about passing ability, cornering grip, and stopping performance. Having accurate performance profiles helps us pass judgment when we compare one contender to the next or draw conclusions at the end of a Four Seasons evaluation. Since there is no industry-wide standard for car testing, every maker has its own pet procedures. Some test with less than a full tank of fuel, some with two passengers and luggage aboard. Doing our own tests is the only means of leveling the playing field. Some publications strive for the quickest, fastest, or most spectacular results. We make no attempt to emulate quarter-mile drag strip results by subtracting the roll-out portion (the 0.3-0.4 seconds required to move the first foot) of the acceleration run. Drag strips divulge nothing but the speed achieved near the end of the quarter mile and the time required to accelerate that distance. Since the strip reports no other time-to-speed information, subtracting roll-out from 0-60 mph results is never warranted. Many magazines do adjust all of their acceleration results by subtracting the roll-out. We do not because, even though that yields quicker, more tantalizing performance figures, it presents a less accurate picture of the car's abilities.


And here is the Camaro info that got lost in all the other shearching \/

1981gMachine is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
5
11-09-2016 11:45 AM
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
3
03-18-2016 11:21 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
8
01-06-2016 07:03 PM
chain
New Member Area
6
08-17-2015 08:52 AM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: F-Body vs Mustang Comparison Chart



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.