kendiesel

i thought it was the mr peanut guy

monkeydude3

i don't know. I haven't worked on as many cars as some people have, but I have found myself asking various questions about EVERY make , brand etc. I have said "why the f*** couldn't it have been like ________" or "that is the stupidest thing I've ever seen" or
"the guy who approved this design had to be smoking something when he approved it"

I dunno really though. What gas milage do the 5.0s get ? I wouldn't know


George

grabbem88

mine was getting 25

monkeydude3

cool cool. Then I have no idea, I don't really know why they do what they do, it's my job to know that they did it and how to fix it.


ugh

grabbem88

but now it's like 15mpg

so1o2k3

lol, owls...

Personally I don't like the the foxbodys as much as the 96-98 or the 99-04 either for that matter. I guess you have to be a true mustang enthusiast to like the 5.0's more than the 96 and up. I've heard that those foxbody year mustang's interiors fall apart easily and aren't put together too well. Is that true?

kendiesel

i had a 91 and the driverside seat tweeked from shifting. The center console snapped were the emergency brake was. Poor Material!!

grabbem88

mines solid...but when subs are in there you'll know what's loose reall quick

hurleymasta

foxbodys are fugly, they are short lil pregnant roller skates with v8's....but i was gonna get one b4 iu got my 96....cuz they are fast and cheap, but they really are ugly

monkeydude3

I have no problem with the fox bodies. Some do look like sh** but when they are in good shape they look bada$$. I know a few guys who have them that are built to high heaven and they just look mean, specially with the cowl hood


George