correct me if im wrong?
04-06-2006, 07:47 AM
#11
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,463
RE: correct me if im wrong?
ORIGINAL: GSXRIntensity
If you can install it you will get much more than 10hp and you redline past 6000rpm. I got around 25hp from it and my redline is 6700rpms with my powering peaking at 6100. My head/cam/intake install netted me a 70rwhp gain. However, if your car is basically stock I'd not jump after the P-51 right away. And yes...like a Vortech. That's all that'll fit really. BTW...I've a stock bottom end
.
ORIGINAL: dvs_03gt
ok say if u are familiar with the p51 intake manifold answer this for me..
if u install it, it gives u 10+ hp, and you can reach a 6000 rpm redline.
with it installed you cant use a twin screw s/c, but u could use a centrifrugal like a vortech?
if you cant use if with a s/c why is it good?
would this be a good mod?
ok say if u are familiar with the p51 intake manifold answer this for me..
if u install it, it gives u 10+ hp, and you can reach a 6000 rpm redline.
with it installed you cant use a twin screw s/c, but u could use a centrifrugal like a vortech?
if you cant use if with a s/c why is it good?
would this be a good mod?
.
04-06-2006, 09:13 AM
#12
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 3,689
RE: correct me if im wrong?
ORIGINAL: IWinULose
I find that hard to believe. I am guessin you were full bolt on before you put heads, cams and the intake on. So, full bolt on GT is say 280rwhp, plus 70rwhp for your setup there, and that puts you at 350rwhp N/A........
ORIGINAL: GSXRIntensity
If you can install it you will get much more than 10hp and you redline past 6000rpm. I got around 25hp from it and my redline is 6700rpms with my powering peaking at 6100. My head/cam/intake install netted me a 70rwhp gain. However, if your car is basically stock I'd not jump after the P-51 right away. And yes...like a Vortech. That's all that'll fit really. BTW...I've a stock bottom end.
ORIGINAL: dvs_03gt
ok say if u are familiar with the p51 intake manifold answer this for me..
if u install it, it gives u 10+ hp, and you can reach a 6000 rpm redline.
with it installed you cant use a twin screw s/c, but u could use a centrifrugal like a vortech?
if you cant use if with a s/c why is it good?
would this be a good mod?
ok say if u are familiar with the p51 intake manifold answer this for me..
if u install it, it gives u 10+ hp, and you can reach a 6000 rpm redline.
with it installed you cant use a twin screw s/c, but u could use a centrifrugal like a vortech?
if you cant use if with a s/c why is it good?
would this be a good mod?
.
04-06-2006, 06:51 PM
#13
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,463
RE: correct me if im wrong?
ORIGINAL: gt96stang
Show me a full bolt-on gt that made that much hp....
ORIGINAL: IWinULose
I find that hard to believe. I am guessin you were full bolt on before you put heads, cams and the intake on. So, full bolt on GT is say 280rwhp, plus 70rwhp for your setup there, and that puts you at 350rwhp N/A........
ORIGINAL: GSXRIntensity
If you can install it you will get much more than 10hp and you redline past 6000rpm. I got around 25hp from it and my redline is 6700rpms with my powering peaking at 6100. My head/cam/intake install netted me a 70rwhp gain. However, if your car is basically stock I'd not jump after the P-51 right away. And yes...like a Vortech. That's all that'll fit really. BTW...I've a stock bottom end.
ORIGINAL: dvs_03gt
ok say if u are familiar with the p51 intake manifold answer this for me..
if u install it, it gives u 10+ hp, and you can reach a 6000 rpm redline.
with it installed you cant use a twin screw s/c, but u could use a centrifrugal like a vortech?
if you cant use if with a s/c why is it good?
would this be a good mod?
ok say if u are familiar with the p51 intake manifold answer this for me..
if u install it, it gives u 10+ hp, and you can reach a 6000 rpm redline.
with it installed you cant use a twin screw s/c, but u could use a centrifrugal like a vortech?
if you cant use if with a s/c why is it good?
would this be a good mod?
.
04-06-2006, 07:22 PM
#14
Mustang Nazi
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
RE: correct me if im wrong?
ORIGINAL: IWinULose
Add up the fiugres. Take a stock GT, at 220rwhp. You need 60 to get to 280rwhp. Full exhaust including LTs, a good tune, CAI, TB and Plenum, all the normal bolt ons and i bet you are darn close to 280RWHP.
Add up the fiugres. Take a stock GT, at 220rwhp. You need 60 to get to 280rwhp. Full exhaust including LTs, a good tune, CAI, TB and Plenum, all the normal bolt ons and i bet you are darn close to 280RWHP.
Not close to 280, maybe around 265-270
04-07-2006, 02:45 PM
#15
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
RE: correct me if im wrong?
ORIGINAL: IWinULose
I find that hard to believe. I am guessin you were full bolt on before you put heads, cams and the intake on. So, full bolt on GT is say 280rwhp, plus 70rwhp for your setup there, and that puts you at 350rwhp N/A........
I find that hard to believe. I am guessin you were full bolt on before you put heads, cams and the intake on. So, full bolt on GT is say 280rwhp, plus 70rwhp for your setup there, and that puts you at 350rwhp N/A........
04-07-2006, 02:47 PM
#16
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
RE: correct me if im wrong?
ORIGINAL: code3GT
Not close to 280, maybe around 265-270
Not close to 280, maybe around 265-270
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM