4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Disappointed in 3:73s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2004, 10:50 PM
  #11  
jeep45238
I ♥ Acer
 
jeep45238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,199
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

And gearing all affects the torque put to the ground yall.......
jeep45238 is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:52 PM
  #12  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,917
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

ORIGINAL: jeep45238

And gearing all affects the torque put to the ground yall.......
But it doesn't actually increase torque numbers.

I think we both get the idea we are pushing on eachother.
Dan04COBRA is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:56 PM
  #13  
jeep45238
I ♥ Acer
 
jeep45238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,199
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

You're right, it doesn't, because I'm not talking about flywheel, but rather torque application to the asphalt.

You know what i mean, I know what you mean. Freindly, yet evil argument in which both parties are correct, lol.
jeep45238 is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:58 PM
  #14  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
GSXRIntensity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

Dan's right...that's why when you install different rearend gears, the rwhp, & ft-lbs are skewed on the dyno as compared to the pulls with the 3.27 installed. I can see the 302 making more lowend ft-lbs if the 4.6 was a pushrod, Even with higher hp #'s the 4.6 would lack the gunt of the 5.0. But as it is...the modular makes better stock #'s everwhere.


Pushing is fun
GSXRIntensity is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 11:00 PM
  #15  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
GSXRIntensity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

you posted exactly when I did. I can see your point too lol. There is no end. We have to agree to AGREE lol
GSXRIntensity is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 11:01 PM
  #16  
D1g1tal V3n0m
I ♥ Acer
 
D1g1tal V3n0m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 333
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

No more then 4.10s in a 5.0 and usually at least 4.10s in a 4.6L be it SOHC or DOHC.
D1g1tal V3n0m is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 11:04 PM
  #17  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,917
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

ORIGINAL: jeep45238

You're right, it doesn't, because I'm not talking about flywheel, but rather torque application to the asphalt.

You know what i mean, I know what you mean. Freindly, yet evil argument in which both parties are correct, lol.
Doesn't happen much in this place either, although we never seem to cross paths very often.
Dan04COBRA is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 02:24 AM
  #18  
NOS/MAN
I ♥ Acer
 
NOS/MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 985
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

okay look at my 99 cobra dyno pull thats with3.27sgears..long tube headder no cats.k/n filter nothing else,,look at the toque almost 300 ft lbs o and pulleys....the 99s where down on power that year, stock they had 256 at the rear wheels..just look at what bolt ons can do..

[IMG]local://upfiles/5822/Ki188430768.jpg[/IMG]
NOS/MAN is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 02:55 AM
  #19  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

Is your stang a auto or 5spd? I still cannot imagine anyone wanting more than 3.73s in even a lightly modded 5spd. With 3.73s and regular raidals I couldnt even come close to hooking up in first. Even with the DRs I still have a bit of wheelspin near readline. 2nd was a real problem with traction till the DRs, was spinning and then bogging down if I shifted real hard.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 05:41 AM
  #20  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
GSXRIntensity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

What brand DR's do you have?

3.73's = [&:][:'(][:@]

4.10's = [8D]

anytime you regear, a set of DR's should already be starved into the financial equation IMO, cuz they are needed. I stand by what I said. Nothing less than 4.10's on a N/A 4.6L. Anything else...might as well save the $$$, & keep the stock gearing

Just to rattle your cage a little...maybe you don't understand why 4.10's are so much better, because you are also in that "I'M COOL CUZ MY FLOWMASTER EXHAUST DOESN'T GIVE ME ANY HORSEPOWER" crowd[8D]
GSXRIntensity is offline  


Quick Reply: Disappointed in 3:73s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.