4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Disappointed in 3:73s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2004, 10:36 AM
  #1  
RJM02GTDrag
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
RJM02GTDrag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 478
Default Disappointed in 3:73s

Had the 3:73's installed and picked it up yesterday expecting a massive difference! Must say I was dissapointed, not the wake up everyone predicts in my book! I would not worry about everyday driving with this ratio my highway RPMs changed VERY little. In 5th gear at 65MPH rpms went from 1800 to 2000, at 70 1900 to 2200 and at 75 2100 went to 2400, hardly noticable, not that different around town either, hope their better at the track!
RJM02GTDrag is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:48 AM
  #2  
jdaniel
I ♥ Acer
 
jdaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 9,172
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

There is a place in Austin Tx that does all my upgrades and the guy that owns the place told me that going from a 3.27 to a 3.73 is no big change at all. He said to really feel a difference at all I need to go with a 3.90 at least. He said 4.10's are the best but I do a lot of highway driving and he said it would put me at about 2400 rpm's at 70 when right now im running 1900 in 70. I might change down the road but not any time soon.
jdaniel is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 11:06 AM
  #3  
SilverGTV8
4th Gear Member
 
SilverGTV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,974
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

I am going 4.11 I should have them in by the middle of next month!
SilverGTV8 is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 07:31 PM
  #4  
NOS/MAN
I ♥ Acer
 
NOS/MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 985
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

sohc motors must be diff,,need more gear,,my cobra had 4.10s its was fun if you wanted to fry the tires all over town ..my 3.73 are better ,,with the prochager....my first gear is not that short anymore..has pull..
NOS/MAN is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:21 PM
  #5  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
GSXRIntensity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

ORIGINAL: RJM02GTDrag

Had the 3:73's installed and picked it up yesterday expecting a massive difference! Must say I was dissapointed, not the wake up everyone predicts in my book! I would not worry about everyday driving with this ratio my highway RPMs changed VERY little. In 5th gear at 65MPH rpms went from 1800 to 2000, at 70 1900 to 2200 and at 75 2100 went to 2400, hardly noticable, not that different around town either, hope their better at the track!
Sigh...some people never learn. I've preached & preached about nothing less than 4.10's in a 4.6 Stang. Sorry you wasted your money, but NOW YOU KNOW. If you think 4.10's scare people, you should see how they react when I say 4.30's!

As for being better at the track...yea you will be better than the 3.27, but vs a 4.10...nope. With the 4.10, you will be shifting right into the meat of you power everytime, & be just were u need to be at the end of the 1/4, where as that last shift w/the 3.73 will drop you out of what I call a powerband, so it sucks. Either you over rev, or shift & loose the peak #'s anyway. HOWEVER...3.73's are the only way to go with a P/A IMO.
GSXRIntensity is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:22 PM
  #6  
jeep45238
I ♥ Acer
 
jeep45238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,199
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

A LOT of 4.6's go with 4.10's for the reason that they lack the low end punch of a pushrod 302.

Now you know why.
jeep45238 is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:31 PM
  #7  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,917
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

Huh? Lack the low-end punch?

I think this is one of the only times you've messed up on here Jeep

Equal in torque buddy!!
Dan04COBRA is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:35 PM
  #8  
jeep45238
I ♥ Acer
 
jeep45238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,199
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

ORIGINAL: Dan02GT

Huh? Lack the low-end punch?

I think this is one of the only times you've messed up on here Jeep

Equal in torque buddy!!
Pushrods+ more cubes=more down low torque than a SOHC 4.6
jeep45238 is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:45 PM
  #9  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,917
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

Actually 99+ GT's have more HP & Torque. The only advantage Fox Bodies have from the factory was weight.

It's the crappy geared 5 speed tranny that's equipped in late model GT's that hinder them..
Dan04COBRA is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:49 PM
  #10  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
GSXRIntensity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,205
Default RE: Disappointed in 3:73s

ORIGINAL: Dan02GT

Actually 99+ GT's have more HP & Torque. The only advantage Fox Bodies have from the factory was weight.
What he said

ORIGINAL: Dan02GT

It's the crappy geared 5 speed tranny that's equipped in late model GT's that hinder them.
Agreed
GSXRIntensity is offline  


Quick Reply: Disappointed in 3:73s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.