mach 1
06-17-2004, 01:27 PM
#5
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 185
RE: mach 1
Is the price difference really worth the half second? The GT's are 14.0 sec cars right? If you throw $10 grand at a GT, you'll have a faster car that's still cheaper. LOL That just the way I look at it. It's why I drive a Z28, and not an SS. It would be cool to say you've got a Mach I though. 
06-17-2004, 01:58 PM
#6
Retired MF Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I live in Canada, eh
Posts: 7,156
RE: mach 1
the Mach isn't nearly $10,000 more than an equally equipped GT (leather, stereo upgrade, premium package) and puts down a sh*tload more power to the wheels, handles better, and holds it's value better. Plus the 32 valve 4 cam engine revs like a *****. plus, plus, plus!
06-17-2004, 04:15 PM
#7
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 622
RE: mach 1
I just purshased a mach 1 in white 2004. after driving a convertable GT 2000 for about 2 years. and the mach 1's arent that much more then the convertable GT's. maybe a few grand at most. But its so worth it, the difference is right there in your face it just drives sooo nice.
06-17-2004, 05:09 PM
#8
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 185
RE: mach 1
LMAO So what you're saying is..... don't talk about what you don't understand..... Got it. 
I thought the Mach's were more expensive than that. A friend of mine has one, and while I don't know what he paid for it, I do know that his payments are in the $500 + range. Since the GT's are more in the $300-$400 range, I guessed $10K difference. And there are still times when I wish I'd have taken the SS just to say I had one.
I thought the Mach's were more expensive than that. A friend of mine has one, and while I don't know what he paid for it, I do know that his payments are in the $500 + range. Since the GT's are more in the $300-$400 range, I guessed $10K difference. And there are still times when I wish I'd have taken the SS just to say I had one.
