ford=not screwing around
09-09-2006, 06:10 AM
#13
Wash Rinse Repeat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,312
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
+1 
ORIGINAL: Knight Mare
Im starting to save my $ now for a bad @ssed 6.8.....as long as its not a 2v.
Im starting to save my $ now for a bad @ssed 6.8.....as long as its not a 2v.
09-09-2006, 01:41 PM
#14
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,287
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
09-09-2006, 01:48 PM
#15
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
09-09-2006, 01:56 PM
#16
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,287
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Its not the same thing though. OHC vs cam in block, etc etc etc.
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
09-09-2006, 02:45 PM
#18
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
oh yeah. wonder why it hasnt been done
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Its not the same thing though. OHC vs cam in block, etc etc etc.
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
The problem is, they are not 100 percent sure that they would make money on it, so alot of companys don't bother trying.
What a wonderful world it would be for 2V 4.6ers if they had a set of true aftermarket aluminum heads for around 1300 bucks that could be cnc ported to flow around 280-300 cfm. Hello 350 WHP+ n/a cars that don't cost 10K to build the engine alone.
09-09-2006, 03:01 PM
#19
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 579
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Lots of risk. BBK is supposed to be working on a set of heads though.
The problem is, they are not 100 percent sure that they would make money on it, so alot of companys don't bother trying.
What a wonderful world it would be for 2V 4.6ers if they had a set of true aftermarket aluminum heads for around 1300 bucks that could be cnc ported to flow around 280-300 cfm. Hello 350 WHP+ n/a cars that don't cost 10K to build the engine alone.
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
oh yeah. wonder why it hasnt been done
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Its not the same thing though. OHC vs cam in block, etc etc etc.
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
The problem is, they are not 100 percent sure that they would make money on it, so alot of companys don't bother trying.
What a wonderful world it would be for 2V 4.6ers if they had a set of true aftermarket aluminum heads for around 1300 bucks that could be cnc ported to flow around 280-300 cfm. Hello 350 WHP+ n/a cars that don't cost 10K to build the engine alone.
09-09-2006, 03:15 PM
#20
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,287
RE: Ford needs to get the ball rolling?
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Lots of risk. BBK is supposed to be working on a set of heads though.
The problem is, they are not 100 percent sure that they would make money on it, so alot of companys don't bother trying.
What a wonderful world it would be for 2V 4.6ers if they had a set of true aftermarket aluminum heads for around 1300 bucks that could be cnc ported to flow around 280-300 cfm. Hello 350 WHP+ n/a cars that don't cost 10K to build the engine alone.
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
oh yeah. wonder why it hasnt been done
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Its not the same thing though. OHC vs cam in block, etc etc etc.
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
ORIGINAL: joshafmil
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
all in all... the 2v isnt bad... its just bad for the 96-04 years. the fox has a 2v engine... and those things are beasty. so even if its a 2v engine (which it prolly wont be) i wouldnt be to worried
The problem isn't the 2v OHC design concept itself, the problem is that ford made it flow like ****. 240~ CFM in full cnc port mode really really sucks.
Said it before, will say it again, the first guy that makes an aftermarket set of heads for a 2v that flow 300 CFM will be one rich ****.
The problem is, they are not 100 percent sure that they would make money on it, so alot of companys don't bother trying.
What a wonderful world it would be for 2V 4.6ers if they had a set of true aftermarket aluminum heads for around 1300 bucks that could be cnc ported to flow around 280-300 cfm. Hello 350 WHP+ n/a cars that don't cost 10K to build the engine alone.