4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Mustang vs. Camaro question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2006, 10:50 PM
  #11  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

yea, same here Mitch, until I had to change my signature image

oh well... Mustangs were ahead of Camaro in teh 5.0 years all the way up to '92, then in '93-95' it was Camaro, and what alot of people forget is that in '96 & '97, Mustangs 4 valve 4.6 was ahead of the LT1... after that through '02 it was ugly though . lol
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 10:51 PM
  #12  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question


ORIGINAL: mustangman02232


ORIGINAL: code3GT

I don't seem to have any problems with the LS WHAT.
gotten into any with HCI yet?
A few
code3GT is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 10:54 PM
  #13  
JJones_86
2nd Gear Member
 
JJones_86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 267
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

Camaros did cost more than mustangs, but we always have the terminator that destroyed them all
JJones_86 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 10:58 PM
  #14  
handyandy
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
handyandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,517
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

I really don't care too much about sales. I'm just a consumer not an advertising or sales executive for Ford or GM. The mustang is more popular for obvious reasons like its sexy looks, but I'm just concerned with how the camaro was built stronger stock. I guess I'll just have to live with it and race those LT1's. What year model of Camaro has an LT1 and how can I tell from the looks of them on the road/track so I know. Would I be able to beat a LT1 with my bolt ons in the sig?
handyandy is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:00 PM
  #15  
blueherd02gt
5th Gear Member
 
blueherd02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,182
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

Did they bring the "maro's" back? or does this mean the 2002 camaro vs the 2002 stang?[&:]
blueherd02gt is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:10 PM
  #16  
sweet99
4th Gear Member
 
sweet99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,178
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

ORIGINAL: 03mustgtRivalry has been around since the late 60s, after all the camaro was built to compete with the mustang. IMO the LS1 camaros are pretty bad ***, but the motor does have a larger displacement, and its fair to say that a mach 1 can compete with a camaro stock for stock. So no we dont have to have FI to keep up.
I agree to use a mach 1 for the comparison. HP numbers are much closer and the 2v motor is not going to be competive. Mark
sweet99 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:13 PM
  #17  
wisk
4th Gear Member
 
wisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: texarkana, tx · 903
Posts: 1,168
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

you can tell an lt1 apart if the camaro headlights are rectangular instead of rounded
and the lt1 firebirds have squareish light lenses as well, plus the tail lights have the straight lines instead of the honeycomb print
wisk is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:49 PM
  #18  
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question


ORIGINAL: code3GT

I don't seem to have any problems with the LS WHAT.
You would with mine pal.
JD1969 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:51 PM
  #19  
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question


ORIGINAL: wes ley n the G T

Yea man Chevy/Pontiac always beat Ford I'm afraid to say. Lets take a look at the rivalries. The base model 6cylinder Camaro and Firebird are basically the same with the same engine, 3800 series motors. These models compete with the base 6cylinder Mustang. The Camaro/Firebird beats the Mustang.

The next class up is the Camaro Z28 and the Formula Firebird. These have the same engine as well, which is the 5.7L LS1. These were made to compete with the Mustang GT, and sadly they do beat the GT.

Lastly the top level of each model is the Camaro SS and Trans-Am. They both have the same 5.7L LS1 but with slight changes like a more agressive tune, better exhaust, etc. These push out about usually 25-30ish HP over the regular 5.7L LS1 found in the Camaro Z28 and Formula Firebird. These have been designed to compete with the Mustang Cobra. Sadly, until the 03 Terminator Cobra, the Trans-Am and Camaro SS have been able to beat its Mustang Cobra counterpart.

The reason the Mustang is most always falling behind is because Ford typically likes smaller engines with less displacement. Say the 5.7L V8 compared to the Ford 4.6L V8. Obviously the 5.7L is generally going to make more power. I guess Ford didnt care too much about this, since they outsold the Camaro and Firebird by almost 3 to 1 I've read. That has led to the cease in production of the Camaro and Trans Am in 2002. Thats my take on things, hope it helped you.
That is completey wrong, the engine is the exact same, the tune is the same and the ram air and cat back do not add any power.
JD1969 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:51 PM
  #20  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro question

ORIGINAL: JD1969


ORIGINAL: code3GT

I don't seem to have any problems with the LS WHAT.
You would with mine pal.
MEANEY
code3GT is offline  


Quick Reply: Mustang vs. Camaro question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.