83700stang

00GT w/ BBK LTS, xpipe, Magnaflow catback, BBK TB, plenum, CAI, 3.73's, Predator, 17inch American Racing Rebels, and the wrong Pro 5.0 shifter. Vortechs sound good and everything but i like the idea of twin screw SC's better. if i went to 18's in the back would i be able to get any traction? i break em loose in first now and a little in second.
KENNE BELL 1.7 vs. VORTECH SQ 2 Any opinions?

gsxrstang69

No question go with the Kenne Bell. Like this shouldnt even be a debate.

blownstanger

KB

Silver4.6

what do you want to do with your car? that will pretty much be the deciding factor

so1o2k3

A centrifugal will pull on a twinscrew on the top-end. For the 1/4 mile, a centrifugal is better since it won't hurt your traction too much in the launch, and when it spools up you just pull away. With a twinscrew, you have instant power because it doesn't need to spool up, and not to mention the awesome whining sound it makes. If you run in 1/4 mile a lot, get the centrifugal. If you mostly drive on the street, get the twinscrew.

stang2000

Centrifugal and go with Procharger!

5speedstang

KB and they dont make the 1.7 anymore they made the 1.7 into the 2.1

JCstang01

I say get the KB, but I might be just slightly biased.

2000GT4.6

Other than the fact that the base kit has no intercooler and comes set at 6 PSI, and the more expensive one costs another 1500 bucks...

If its a 1.7 non intercooled vs a non cooled SQ, no question get the centri. IMO it's still a tossup with the 2.2L.

The vortech costs less, makes the power where ya need it, and has awsome street manners under about 3000 RPM. I am getting 21.5 MPG on the highway with cams and ehxaust, 1 MPG better than before the blower.

Everyone yells "KB!" but when it comes down to buying it...