4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

why did ford do this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2004, 02:06 AM
  #1  
HAUS
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HAUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lansdale, Pa
Posts: 1,192
Default why did ford do this?

why dint ford ever put in the 5.4 in the mustang. why dint they go from a 302 to a 330 instead to a 281
HAUS is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 02:07 AM
  #2  
2001_SaleenS281_08
5th Gear Member
 
2001_SaleenS281_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,063
Default RE: why did ford do this?

because they wan't mustangs to be fast, not super fast!!
2001_SaleenS281_08 is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 02:17 AM
  #3  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,917
Default RE: why did ford do this?

Fuel economy & the smaller the engine, typically the less it cost to manufacture.

Also marketing has a lot to do with it. More people will buy GT's to cruise rather than race. A 260hp 4.6 liter engine with decent fuel economy is far more attractive as a weekend driver or a family cruise car than a 325hp 5.7 liter engine. You'll see more Mom & Pops driving the 260hp car than the 325hp car...

This is why the V6 Mustang & V6 Camaro out sold the V8 platforms.
Dan04COBRA is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 02:27 AM
  #4  
HAUS
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HAUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lansdale, Pa
Posts: 1,192
Default RE: why did ford do this?

yeah i do see alot of older people driving the mustangs than the camaros. i wish ford could put back the t tops on the mustang
HAUS is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 03:45 AM
  #5  
jdaniel
I ♥ Acer
 
jdaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 9,172
Default RE: why did ford do this?

They did put a 5.4 in the stang. The Cobra R had a S/C 5.4 didnt it?
jdaniel is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 03:46 AM
  #6  
USAMuscle
4th Gear Member
 
USAMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,404
Default RE: why did ford do this?

ORIGINAL: Dan02GT

This is why the V6 Mustang & V6 Camaro out sold the V8 platforms.
That and insurance costs, plus the parents who know better than to hand their kids the keys to a V8.
USAMuscle is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 03:50 AM
  #7  
HAUS
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HAUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lansdale, Pa
Posts: 1,192
Default RE: why did ford do this?

ORIGINAL: jdaniel

They did put a 5.4 in the stang. The Cobra R had a S/C 5.4 didnt it?
thats right for did put that in the 2000 cobra r but it was a N/A 385 hp
HAUS is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 12:00 PM
  #8  
TattooTears
4th Gear Member
 
TattooTears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1,240
Default RE: why did ford do this?

If you are feeling the need for 5.4L power you can always buy the 5.4L Lincoln Navigator engine and drop it in.
TattooTears is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 12:31 PM
  #9  
04ShakinSteed
I ♥ Acer
 
04ShakinSteed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Reading, Pa.
Posts: 2,617
Default RE: why did ford do this?

ORIGINAL: 92_LX_5_POINT_0

ORIGINAL: jdaniel

They did put a 5.4 in the stang. The Cobra R had a S/C 5.4 didnt it?
thats right for did put that in the 2000 cobra r but it was a N/A 385 hp
[sm=exactly.gif]
04ShakinSteed is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 03:30 PM
  #10  
dustinpolcz
2nd Gear Member
 
dustinpolcz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 155
Default RE: why did ford do this?

i heard fuel economy and the 281's were obviously lighter weight and could handle the same amount of power as a 302.
dustinpolcz is offline  


Quick Reply: why did ford do this?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.