4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

why not turbo!!??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2004, 02:36 PM
  #11  
MikeHawke
Retired MF Moderator
 
MikeHawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I live in Canada, eh
Posts: 7,156
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

No cheap or easy turbo systems available for our stangs because the 4.6 engine is so large (physically). There are so many things that would need to be replaced to go with a turbo - it would entail new headers, k-member, alot of extra piping, etc. and the engine would have to be removed from the car to fit everything. So cost and ease of installation are the main reasons for going with a supercharger. I'd rather have a turbo as well.. as long as its sized properly you will get more peak hp over ANY supercharger and more torque and down low power than ANY centrifugal supercharger.
^ YEAH! ^
MikeHawke is offline  
Old 09-15-2004, 07:27 PM
  #12  
stonemonk9
3rd Gear Member
 
stonemonk9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 715
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

ya, my friend was gettin me a free turbo and intercooler, and after i researched the job for acouple weeks, i jus decided it wuld jus be too much work and money, but maaaaan wuld thatve been awesome
stonemonk9 is offline  
Old 09-26-2004, 06:24 PM
  #13  
exzercist
 
exzercist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

i guess noone has seen the twin turbo stangs that hang or beat tt supras. there fricken fast and they are loud and grumblie. they dont have a wimpy sound!
exzercist is offline  
Old 09-26-2004, 06:54 PM
  #14  
Acer2428
Site Mod
 
Acer2428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oh, Hi.... Oh?
Posts: 8,667
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

Guess you've never seen the S/Ced Stangs that beat the **** out of tt supras, huh?
Acer2428 is offline  
Old 09-26-2004, 08:25 PM
  #15  
2001_SaleenS281_08
5th Gear Member
 
2001_SaleenS281_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,063
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

ORIGINAL: exzercist

i guess noone has seen the twin turbo stangs that hang or beat tt supras. there fricken fast and they are loud and grumblie. they dont have a wimpy sound!
if the turbos were the same size with same boost, the mustang would always win, unless the driver fell asleep V8vs.6cyl
2001_SaleenS281_08 is offline  
Old 09-26-2004, 08:51 PM
  #16  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

My long term goal is a turbo 5.4 conversion.
code3GT is offline  
Old 09-26-2004, 11:52 PM
  #17  
yellowstang98
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
yellowstang98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 598
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

anyone have a clip of supercharged stang beating the **** out of a tt supra? id like to see that one...i love stangs but those damn supras are quick-especially the tt ones...
yellowstang98 is offline  
Old 09-27-2004, 10:40 AM
  #18  
94Cbra
4th Gear Member
 
94Cbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Kentucky
Posts: 1,487
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

Supras are quick but they are dyno queens. Id rather have a S/C too.
94Cbra is offline  
Old 09-27-2004, 01:13 PM
  #19  
stonemonk9
3rd Gear Member
 
stonemonk9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 715
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

5.4 turbo would be insane, i think there was one of those in a fox body in a 5.0 magazine i was readin, hell id be happy with jus a 5.4!
stonemonk9 is offline  
Old 09-27-2004, 01:21 PM
  #20  
Birdieman4
5th Gear Member
 
Birdieman4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,020
Default RE: why not turbo!!??

I agree with Roundman; I'd rather be blown myself.
________
02 S281E #60 R.I.P.
Birdieman4 is offline  


Quick Reply: why not turbo!!??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.