Yet another boost question
#11
RE: Yet another boost question
ORIGINAL: Scjar
Ah, ok, so I still don't see why not to doa KB. How much cheaper is the procharge or vortech? [/align][/align]I love the turbo sound, but they are just too pricey for me right now. I'm just a college student with a g/f so my money is limited And if I had to build the engine just to get use out of it, it seems likea waste atm anyway. [/align][/align]The KB website said the KB 2.1 was just a hundred or so more than the Mongoose. Unless this didn't include all the installation/running accessories I don't see why you wouldn't go with KB if its a better system.[/align]
Ah, ok, so I still don't see why not to doa KB. How much cheaper is the procharge or vortech? [/align][/align]I love the turbo sound, but they are just too pricey for me right now. I'm just a college student with a g/f so my money is limited And if I had to build the engine just to get use out of it, it seems likea waste atm anyway. [/align][/align]The KB website said the KB 2.1 was just a hundred or so more than the Mongoose. Unless this didn't include all the installation/running accessories I don't see why you wouldn't go with KB if its a better system.[/align]
#13
RE: Yet another boost question
ORIGINAL: Scjar
So with the intercooled KB you could put 400-500 rwhp on the stock engine?
So with the intercooled KB you could put 400-500 rwhp on the stock engine?
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...2v/gt96-04.htm
#14
RE: Yet another boost question
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
#15
RE: Yet another boost question
ORIGINAL: Scjar
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
#16
RE: Yet another boost question
ORIGINAL: Scjar
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
What you seem to be missing is what happens when you're not at WOT. At 1500 rpm and below, not WOT, the blower's bypass valve is engaged, so there is virtually no boost, and no parasitic losses. As far as your motor is concearned, the blower isn't even there. I have about 14# vaccuum in this condition. Half-throttle at 2500 rpm, I'm up to no vaccuum (0# boost). Boost #'s ramp up gradually as you give it more throttle (e.g. 2/3 trottle gives me about 1/2 my maximum boost #).Boost kicks in as smoothly as your foot asks it to.
When I got my first twin-screw, I was kinda scared about drivability. The only thing I needed to learn was being carefull about WOT through the gear shifts (I have an AOD tranny). I got sideways more than once, spinning my tires @ 50mph shifting into 2nd at WOT.
#17
RE: Yet another boost question
well i dont think im the only one wondering, how much would it cost to build your engine? what would that include and how much it would be for parts, seperately from an install? also, if you have a built motor and a kenne bell, would it still be a bad daily driver?
#18
RE: Yet another boost question
ORIGINAL: jacrockett
Time for a little lesson in how twin-screws work. Max boost for a given installation is based on pulley size. When you stand on the gas (WOT), you are at maximum boost in less than .5 sec, regardless of where your rpm's are at the time. That is the "down low" boost the twin-screw owners love so much.... which gives you waaaaaay more torque imediately (if you ask for it)
What you seem to be missing is what happens when you're not at WOT. At 1500 rpm and below, not WOT, the blower's bypass valve is engaged, so there is virtually no boost, and no parasitic losses. As far as your motor is concearned, the blower isn't even there. I have about 14# vaccuum in this condition. Half-throttle at 2500 rpm, I'm up to no vaccuum (0# boost). Boost #'s ramp up gradually as you give it more throttle (e.g. 2/3 trottle gives me about 1/2 my maximum boost #).Boost kicks in as smoothly as your foot asks it to.
When I got my first twin-screw, I was kinda scared about drivability. The only thing I needed to learn was being carefull about WOT through the gear shifts (I have an AOD tranny). I got sideways more than once, spinning my tires @ 50mph shifting into 2nd at WOT.
ORIGINAL: Scjar
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
Yeah I have been looking all over the KB website. I think I have decided against it mainly for less constant stress on the engine since it boosts low. Which type is the Mongoose? (sorry for my stupidity).[/align][/align]I have a little bit it think it over still. I still need to save up, and have other mods I would like to get first.[/align]
What you seem to be missing is what happens when you're not at WOT. At 1500 rpm and below, not WOT, the blower's bypass valve is engaged, so there is virtually no boost, and no parasitic losses. As far as your motor is concearned, the blower isn't even there. I have about 14# vaccuum in this condition. Half-throttle at 2500 rpm, I'm up to no vaccuum (0# boost). Boost #'s ramp up gradually as you give it more throttle (e.g. 2/3 trottle gives me about 1/2 my maximum boost #).Boost kicks in as smoothly as your foot asks it to.
When I got my first twin-screw, I was kinda scared about drivability. The only thing I needed to learn was being carefull about WOT through the gear shifts (I have an AOD tranny). I got sideways more than once, spinning my tires @ 50mph shifting into 2nd at WOT.
#19
RE: Yet another boost question
First thing is to try to decide where you want to end up; power wise. In the beginning, I had no idea how addicted to power I was going to be. I could have saved many thousands of dollars if I had know then what I know now. For a daily driver, up to 400rwhp you are in one cost category, above that is aVERY different world, with big $$ required to last very long in it. Others will argue that the threshold is at a little higher, but the point is that as soon as you exceed what the stock block can hold on a "safe" tune, everything changes in terms of cost.
Take what you read on the KB website with a BIG grain of salt. They don't run pump gas in their 10# (and up) boost examples. They spend days doing dyno pull after dyno pull, to eek out the numbers they publish. They aren't running anything close to a daily driver tune either. The stuff published by KB is what led me to believe the bullsh#t I was fed by the first shop I worked with. That mistake cost me over $15k.... a painful lesson learned.
Twin-screw blowers are perfect for my application, and KB has very nice hardware. However, be advised that the 2v manifold and the 4v manifolds are very different. Once you start down the 2v path, it is very expensive to get off. This is not a problem if 400rwhp is enough for you (that is a lot of power on the street). If you want to be stronger than Vipers, new Z06's, or the GT500, or mildly modified Terminators, the 2v Modular motor will NEVER get there with DD reliability and/or Nitrous.
Take what you read on the KB website with a BIG grain of salt. They don't run pump gas in their 10# (and up) boost examples. They spend days doing dyno pull after dyno pull, to eek out the numbers they publish. They aren't running anything close to a daily driver tune either. The stuff published by KB is what led me to believe the bullsh#t I was fed by the first shop I worked with. That mistake cost me over $15k.... a painful lesson learned.
Twin-screw blowers are perfect for my application, and KB has very nice hardware. However, be advised that the 2v manifold and the 4v manifolds are very different. Once you start down the 2v path, it is very expensive to get off. This is not a problem if 400rwhp is enough for you (that is a lot of power on the street). If you want to be stronger than Vipers, new Z06's, or the GT500, or mildly modified Terminators, the 2v Modular motor will NEVER get there with DD reliability and/or Nitrous.