My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
#51
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
ORIGINAL: M1ke
i think the "results" arent trustworthy. you could make passes all day and never have 2 the same. with that said, if there's a difference in .05 because of your ram air, its so negligable, there's no way you could prove its the ram air. i.e. placebo affect
try and spend as long as you can at the track until you get one pass that you felt was pretty good. then take the ducting off and make passes again until you get another one pretty good and similar to the first good one. this gets rid of some variables that could have been the reason for an increase in et and trap.
i think the "results" arent trustworthy. you could make passes all day and never have 2 the same. with that said, if there's a difference in .05 because of your ram air, its so negligable, there's no way you could prove its the ram air. i.e. placebo affect
try and spend as long as you can at the track until you get one pass that you felt was pretty good. then take the ducting off and make passes again until you get another one pretty good and similar to the first good one. this gets rid of some variables that could have been the reason for an increase in et and trap.
http://www.karlsnet.com/mopar/ramair.shtml
#52
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
The best will net .5 psi of boost at 100mph, common will net .2psi, and your dryer tube will netless than both. I would consider that pretty close to nothing.
IF your little "invention" was so great and knocked off .4 secin the 1/4, why wouldnt everyone have one? Why wouldntall manufacturesput them on stock?
I think its really cool that you had the idea, and did it all yourself, I think it looks cool, but I dontbelieve it does ****.
Very nice times none the less. 13.1 at 105 is a great time.
IF your little "invention" was so great and knocked off .4 secin the 1/4, why wouldnt everyone have one? Why wouldntall manufacturesput them on stock?
I think its really cool that you had the idea, and did it all yourself, I think it looks cool, but I dontbelieve it does ****.
Very nice times none the less. 13.1 at 105 is a great time.
#53
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
ORIGINAL: ZW99GT
The best will net .5 psi of boost at 100mph, common will net .2psi, and your dryer tube will netless than both. I would consider that pretty close to nothing.
IF your little "invention" was so great and knocked off .4 secin the 1/4, why wouldnt everyone have one? Why wouldnt Ford put them on stock?
I think its really cool that you had the idea, and did it all yourself, I think it looks cool, but I dontbelieve it does ****.
Very nice times none the less. 13.1 at 105 is a great time.
The best will net .5 psi of boost at 100mph, common will net .2psi, and your dryer tube will netless than both. I would consider that pretty close to nothing.
IF your little "invention" was so great and knocked off .4 secin the 1/4, why wouldnt everyone have one? Why wouldnt Ford put them on stock?
I think its really cool that you had the idea, and did it all yourself, I think it looks cool, but I dontbelieve it does ****.
Very nice times none the less. 13.1 at 105 is a great time.
#54
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
ORIGINAL: ZW99GT
The best will net .5 psi of boost at 100mph, common will net .2psi, and your dryer tube will netless than both. I would consider that pretty close to nothing.
IF your little "invention" was so great and knocked off .4 secin the 1/4, why wouldnt everyone have one? Why wouldnt Ford put them on stock?
I think its really cool that you had the idea, and did it all yourself, I think it looks cool, but I dontbelieve it does ****.
Very nice times none the less. 13.1 at 105 is a great time.
The best will net .5 psi of boost at 100mph, common will net .2psi, and your dryer tube will netless than both. I would consider that pretty close to nothing.
IF your little "invention" was so great and knocked off .4 secin the 1/4, why wouldnt everyone have one? Why wouldnt Ford put them on stock?
I think its really cool that you had the idea, and did it all yourself, I think it looks cool, but I dontbelieve it does ****.
Very nice times none the less. 13.1 at 105 is a great time.
#55
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
Heres a dyno compairison that Sport Rider magazine did compairing dynoing a bike with and without ram air. Please read the article fully before posting regarding this...
http://www.sportrider.com/tech/146_9912_ram/
http://www.sportrider.com/tech/146_9912_ram/
#56
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
I just did a little research on my own, and I see what you mean. I apologize. I shoulda looked at some **** before I commented.
It takes away from negative boost? It get the intakepressure closer to atmospheric?Isnt that simpliy what it does?
It takes away from negative boost? It get the intakepressure closer to atmospheric?Isnt that simpliy what it does?
#57
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
I just did a little research on my own, and I see what you mean. I apologize. I shoulda looked at some **** before I commented.
It takes away from negative boost? It get the intakepressure closer to atmospheric?Isnt that simpliy what it does?
It takes away from negative boost? It get the intakepressure closer to atmospheric?Isnt that simpliy what it does?
#58
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
Ok, here is an extensive article I found on ram air... Please all doupters and even anyone who wants to educate them selves on the subject... I highly suggest you read this article.. It is very long, but but it will prove and clarify many beliefs.... Please read this. http://www.vararam.com/ramairinaroadcar.html
#59
RE: My ghetto a$$ ram air....pics.
very cool. I think it is "something fun to talk about" hahhahaha LMAO but, if you got an improvement....hmmmmmm. Worth thinking about. Make sure you keep us abreast on the production of your RAM air. A very creative idea indeed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ccdguy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
09-19-2015 05:20 PM
New Era Performance
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
1
04-20-2004 10:17 PM