Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT - Page 3 - MustangForums.com


4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-05-2004, 11:27 PM   #21  
98FOUR.SIX
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 100
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

YEA I CAN READ YOU THINK YOUR 99+ MUSTANG IS SO BAD [email protected]@ 260 HP BIG WOOP
98FOUR.SIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 11:30 PM   #22  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,915
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

What?
Dan04COBRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 11:33 PM   #23  
Sean
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 893
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

LMAO!!!
Sean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 12:18 AM   #24  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,204
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

I've read enough of this thread to know that the person who started it has no knowledge about LT1's, LS1's, nor does he know the difference between Firebirds, & Trans AMs. Furthermore, if you wish to trash WS.6's or F-bodies in particular it would help for you to do some homework, & realize you need more than Flowmaster mufflers, & K&N intake to even keep up w/a misfiring LT1 w/80k miles on it. BTW...it's 281 not 289.

Gripes about F-bodies IMO = rattling doors, very poor build quality (nod to Camaros), F*cked up unnecessary bump on passenger side floor, extremely long dashboard, HEAVY

Complements = no replacement for displacement, did I mention the FireHawk looks like the Batmobile, Can easily get into low 12's & high 11's w/a lot less work than a 4.6. They are purpose built. The downside to that is not everyone wants to go fast, & that's where the Mustang was able to succeed in the buying market. It gave everyone a bit of what they wanted.

I love Mustangs, but let's be realistic. Stock for stock no turd 96-98 GT (chambered mufflers, & an air filther doesn't do anything for a 96-98) will give any F-body driver more than a glance, & another notch on his gun if he/she tries to race the F-body. 260hp on the 99+ GT's is a significant jump from the 96-98 models. No it's not ground braking, but if you want ground braking go buy a Lamborghini

Sorry, this is so long, but that story in the beginning just disturbs me. Some Pontiac makes a turn, goes WOT (all the while the Mustang driver hating the Pontiac's exhaust...mind you exhaust sound preference is completely subjective) only to have his g/f floor it to end up catching the Pontiac, never once considering that maybe the Pontiac might have just wanted to hear that exhaust & get off of it, not even considering a 96-98 GT wanted to throw down, & could have quite possibly been laughing in his car thinking that it took the GT long enough to catch up.
GSXRIntensity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 12:27 AM   #25  
Big5.0.13.7sec.
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 202
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

WOW this is great. LOL.

I guess i dont know my lt1's and ls1's...... but who gives a sh*t. Im into mustangs... I dont really care what kind of car that was... I thought the story was funny!

In all honesty.... it was just to make everyone laugh.... i guess I thought "mustang" people would get a kick out of it! And I usually dont have to worry about what kind of car is in front of me or behind
me...cause I am the faster car.... But now my fiances' car is the new project after hearing all this crap talk. I guess it needs a little work.... and some weight reduction.

Thanks for the correction on the 281 dick head.

And seeing you didnt read at the begining I said; But either way when a GT with flowmasters and and fenderwall intake w/ K&N filter: meaning Cat Backs and I said cold air intake (whooptie 4 horses) LOL

[sm=angrymail.gif]And what car did the discontinue? Oh yeah slowmaros and firechickens... Thanks LOL[sm=closed.gif]
Big5.0.13.7sec. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 01:15 AM   #26  
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chi-town!!!
Posts: 1,204
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Big5.0.13.7sec.

WOW this is great. LOL.

I guess i dont know my lt1's and ls1's...... but who gives a sh*t. Im into mustangs... I dont really care what kind of car that was... I thought the story was funny!

In all honesty.... it was just to make everyone laugh.... i guess I thought "mustang" people would get a kick out of it! And I usually dont have to worry about what kind of car is in front of me or behind
me...cause I am the faster car.... But now my fiances' car is the new project after hearing all this crap talk. I guess it needs a little work.... and some weight reduction.

Thanks for the correction on the 281 dick head.

And seeing you didnt read at the begining I said; But either way when a GT with flowmasters and and fenderwall intake w/ K&N filter: meaning Cat Backs and I said cold air intake (whooptie 4 horses) LOL

[sm=angrymail.gif]And what car did the discontinue? Oh yeah slowmaros and firechickens... Thanks LOL[sm=closed.gif]
For being such a Mustang enthusiast, you a GREAT job of showing your extensive knowledge of them...289ci...wow...then you know so much about the Mustang's arch enemy you even know that it was discontinued...Holy Sh*t!!! Seeing as you don't "give a sh*t" about F-bodies, how can you hope to beat the enemy w/out knowing his strategy?

A CrapMaster cat-back will net you 1-2rwhp, & the cold air intake is a waste of $$$ for 2rwhp. Yea, you really have some knowledge about performance gains on Mustangs[&:]. I maybe a ********, but at least I'm more performance inclined than your dumba$$.
GSXRIntensity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 01:27 AM   #27  
NicksMeanGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 152
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

Quote:
A CrapMaster cat-back will net you 1-2rwhp
Awww shucks fella. you didn't have to go and call them crapmasters. my mean sounding flows net me 3-4 fwhp every day. Females Wanting to Have
Pimp that is...
NicksMeanGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 02:37 AM   #28  
Big5.0.13.7sec.
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 202
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

Aww dont get all pissed off... you little vag. LOL

I was just saying... that I thought it was funny.

And once again I dont have to worry about my "arch enemy" of cars....

I am a mustang enthusiast, but Im a 5.0 guy, Just getting into the 281 4.6L.

I guess seeing I pull a 12.8 in my 5.0 I guess I dont know much about performance LOL. You *******.

Actually I believe the Flowmasters add on average 5-7 rwhp. And the intake is a densecharger w/k&n and that would be 4-6 rwhp. So if you add that up that an additional 10-13 horses that was bought with $300-$350. Not to mention those mods just make it sound better!

So thanks for your imput buddy
Big5.0.13.7sec. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 02:43 AM   #29  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,915
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Sean

LMAO!!!
What's so funny! [8D]
Dan04COBRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 03:22 AM   #30  
Sean
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 893
Default RE: Trans-Am VS. Mustang GT

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Dan02GT

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Sean

LMAO!!!
What's so funny! [8D]
I just thought it was funny how 98Four got all pissed off, and you were like WTF?
I was thinking the same thing you were, where the *** did that come from?
Sean is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2003-2004 SVT Cobra Fog Light LED Bulbs! Plug & Play install! See Comparison Photos! Diode Dynamics Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds 5 02-28-2018 10:39 AM
**New...from NAT! 2015 Ford Mustang MRT Rear Window Louvers**Free shipping! NorthAmericanTuning Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds 5 11-09-2016 11:45 AM
**New from NAT!2015 Ford Mustang MRT Rear Window Louvers**Free Shipping! NorthAmericanTuning The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang 3 03-18-2016 11:21 AM
What's considered normal oil pressure? yurizx6r 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang 49 09-07-2015 06:40 PM
Just swapped motor exhaust want fit daytooday Motor Swap Section 2 08-11-2015 09:22 AM


Tags
1998, 2000, 2003, 66, air, bars, faster, ford, gt, install, lakewood, mach, mustang, pontiac, ram, traction, trans, v6, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.