Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
01-25-2007, 01:30 PM
#21
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
ORIGINAL: frdmstng1986GT
i am pretty sure that the S2K only runs likea 14.5 in the qaurter so i think you should be able to take him with no problem if you can drive.
i am pretty sure that the S2K only runs likea 14.5 in the qaurter so i think you should be able to take him with no problem if you can drive.
With most people driving GT's, they around the 14.5 mark.
01-25-2007, 02:17 PM
#22
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 546
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
i dont see an s2000 being even with a stock new edge its rated at 240 bhp and 160 lb-ft of torque and it ways about 3000ish pounds. From a roll the s2000 would have a better chance...from a dig (if you can drive) you will more than likely win...just my .02
01-25-2007, 02:27 PM
#23
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
ORIGINAL: ant02gt
i dont see an s2000 being even with a stock new edge its rated at 240 bhp and 160 lb-ft of torque and it ways about 3000ish pounds. From a roll the s2000 would have a better chance...from a dig (if you can drive) you will more than likely win...just my .02
i dont see an s2000 being even with a stock new edge its rated at 240 bhp and 160 lb-ft of torque and it ways about 3000ish pounds. From a roll the s2000 would have a better chance...from a dig (if you can drive) you will more than likely win...just my .02
The mags consistantly get 13.8/13.9 for the s2k, which is definatly quicker than the GT. It's going to be a drivers race either way, if he doesnt launch the thing at 7k he'll never get off the line. But if the GT just spins it could be a bloodbath as well. All depends on the drivers; but two properly driven cars especially in a street race i'd give it to the s2k. He wont have traction troubles like the GT will.
01-25-2007, 02:48 PM
#24
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 938
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
ORIGINAL: czwalga00gt
I dont mind spelling errors... I hate blatent misuse of the language to sound cool.
I dont mind spelling errors... I hate blatent misuse of the language to sound cool.
No doubt you got him, if he is stock as you say.
01-25-2007, 03:42 PM
#25
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
ORIGINAL: Hyper00
Kind of like blatant misuse? If you're no spelling bee champion, lay off the spelling corrections.
No doubt you got him, if he is stock as you say.
ORIGINAL: czwalga00gt
I dont mind spelling errors... I hate blatent misuse of the language to sound cool.
I dont mind spelling errors... I hate blatent misuse of the language to sound cool.
No doubt you got him, if he is stock as you say.
I guess you dont understand things very well. It's not the spelling, its the fact that people spell **** wrong on purpose. It shows your maturity level. Real tough concept.
01-25-2007, 06:11 PM
#28
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 450
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
ORIGINAL: trance565
amazing how you catch school, and not "guyz" but ohwell. if your gonna pick on somones spelling, make sure to get all the mistakes.
ORIGINAL: czwalga00gt
It's actually spelled 'school'.
It's actually spelled 'school'.
01-25-2007, 06:15 PM
#29
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Posts: 5,928
RE: Me vs 2003 s2000 TOMMROW!
ORIGINAL: nanaki
a yellow s2000 was messing with me one day and tried to do a flyby. i dropped it down to 3rd at 60 (55mph speed limit) and spun the tires like crazy and took off. he stopped right after and made a turn at the next light
can you even go over speed bumps with a 3" drop?
a yellow s2000 was messing with me one day and tried to do a flyby. i dropped it down to 3rd at 60 (55mph speed limit) and spun the tires like crazy and took off. he stopped right after and made a turn at the next light
can you even go over speed bumps with a 3" drop?