Twin turbo non pi track vid.
04-03-2007, 01:29 PM
#11
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,644
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: Dan04COBRA
No BS, just interested in seeing pics.
No BS, just interested in seeing pics.
04-03-2007, 01:32 PM
#12
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: Dan04COBRA
I'd figure with a 112 trap speed he is a touch over 400rwhp.
$10 bucks on the table here, make a wager? [8D]
ORIGINAL: czwalga00gt
How much rwhp?
How much rwhp?
$10 bucks on the table here, make a wager? [8D]
I'll take the bet. A touch over 400 is what 401rwhp?
So just to clarify, if he has 0-400rwhp, or 402rwhp + I win 10$. [8D]
I'll play the odds and wait to see a dyno sheet that says 401rwhp, because thats how my luck is.
04-03-2007, 01:36 PM
#14
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: Dan04COBRA
LOL, I was figuring 400-420rwhp for a 112 trap.
03mustgt, thanks for that link. Gonna look it over now. [8D] Ooh that thread says 403rwhp! Damn I'm good.
LOL, I was figuring 400-420rwhp for a 112 trap.
03mustgt, thanks for that link. Gonna look it over now. [8D] Ooh that thread says 403rwhp! Damn I'm good.
Paypal: czwalgse@notes.udayton.edu
04-03-2007, 01:40 PM
#16
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 235
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
you figure with a better 60 ft (1.7ish) hes still gonna barely be scrapin the mid-high 12s, seems a bit low for a 400+hp car (guessing by the trap speed.) Maybe step up the gearing to a 3.73 or higher(dont know what is best for keeping turbos spooled) and id think the ET would drop considerably considering how hard it likes to pull when it starts to spool on the top end.
I think a 4.10 would be too high as it might not be enough to carry you across the trap with the kinda hp/speed you are carrying already.
Also the sticky tires would help immensely as you could brake boost it and really help those 60s when you can put the extra hp to the ground.
I think a 4.10 would be too high as it might not be enough to carry you across the trap with the kinda hp/speed you are carrying already.
Also the sticky tires would help immensely as you could brake boost it and really help those 60s when you can put the extra hp to the ground.
04-03-2007, 01:43 PM
#17
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,644
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: Dan04COBRA
LOL, I was figuring 400-420rwhp for a 112 trap.
03mustgt, thanks for that link. Gonna look it over now. [8D] Ooh that thread says 403rwhp! Damn I'm good.
LOL, I was figuring 400-420rwhp for a 112 trap.
03mustgt, thanks for that link. Gonna look it over now. [8D] Ooh that thread says 403rwhp! Damn I'm good.
04-03-2007, 01:55 PM
#18
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: carlisle PA
Posts: 3,007
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: 03mustgt
Yeah but you did not trap anywhere near 109. He has the trap, now he needs traction.
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
yeah that 60ft time is pretty high, i was a few tenths higher than that in my basically stock auto non PI, but that's w/ 3:73s
yeah that 60ft time is pretty high, i was a few tenths higher than that in my basically stock auto non PI, but that's w/ 3:73s
04-03-2007, 02:01 PM
#19
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
i dont care bout trap speeds i was just talking bout 60ft times
ORIGINAL: 03mustgt
Yeah but you did not trap anywhere near 109. He has the trap, now he needs traction.
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
yeah that 60ft time is pretty high, i was a few tenths higher than that in my basically stock auto non PI, but that's w/ 3:73s
yeah that 60ft time is pretty high, i was a few tenths higher than that in my basically stock auto non PI, but that's w/ 3:73s
04-03-2007, 02:01 PM
#20
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,644
RE: Twin turbo non pi track vid.
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
ORIGINAL: 03mustgt
Yeah but you did not trap anywhere near 109. He has the trap, now he needs traction.
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
yeah that 60ft time is pretty high, i was a few tenths higher than that in my basically stock auto non PI, but that's w/ 3:73s
yeah that 60ft time is pretty high, i was a few tenths higher than that in my basically stock auto non PI, but that's w/ 3:73s
i dont care bout trap speeds i was just talking bout 60ft times