Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
#12
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
dude dont be that discouraged, i have found out that those rsx type s's are real quick and respond well to mods, wit just a header and a cold air they are just about as fast as a 96-98 cobra. yea i kno so dont feel bad.
#13
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
ORIGINAL: jthomsen85
+1 on feeling sorry for 2 valves. Not a day goes by that I dont wish that I save up a little more money and got a cobra or mach.
+1 on feeling sorry for 2 valves. Not a day goes by that I dont wish that I save up a little more money and got a cobra or mach.
That's what I did, and I'm very happy.
#14
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
I've beeten one 2/3 races. He had an intake, and i have a catback and intake...not that it makes a difference. Its a driver race. Maybe the stang was auto?
#15
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
yeah my 98 gt was pretty slow with just an exhaust, but i did race a RSX once from a dead stop and we were pretty dead even until we had to slow for next set of lights.
i have spent probably around 4000 on parts and am at 270rwhp w/ 300lbs of torque, if i had been a little smarter i would have gotten 99+ gt and would be at 300+.
i have spent probably around 4000 on parts and am at 270rwhp w/ 300lbs of torque, if i had been a little smarter i would have gotten 99+ gt and would be at 300+.
#16
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
The 96-98 GTs are only 215 or 225 HP ('98), the 260 HP that the '99 to '04s have is better--but it's still not a whole lot for a 3250 lb car. Don't get me wrong, I like my '03 GT and with the intake, exhaust, '93 octane tuning, and 3.73 gears it's a pretty fast car when driven well--in fact it's almost as fast as my 10 psi supercharged 1.6L '92 Miata.[/align][/align]An other issue is that, and as Bob Hall generally considered to be the father of the Miata said:
[/align]
"If you can't drive fast with 90 HP, 900 won't help."
#17
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
ORIGINAL: stang22jh
yeah my 98 gt was pretty slow with just an exhaust, but i did race a RSX once from a dead stop and we were pretty dead even until we had to slow for next set of lights.
i have spent probably around 4000 on parts and am at 270rwhp w/ 300lbs of torque, if i had been a little smarter i would have gotten 99+ gt and would be at 300+.
yeah my 98 gt was pretty slow with just an exhaust, but i did race a RSX once from a dead stop and we were pretty dead even until we had to slow for next set of lights.
i have spent probably around 4000 on parts and am at 270rwhp w/ 300lbs of torque, if i had been a little smarter i would have gotten 99+ gt and would be at 300+.
#18
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
I knew a guy with an RSX with intake and exhaust that would probably be a drivers race against an edge stang...That is untill he pulled water through his CAI and ruined his motor.
#20
RE: Are SN95 Stangs really this slow?????
ORIGINAL: Adam03GT
The sn95 GTs are EXTREMELY slow... I consider a 15 second car pretty damn slow.
The sn95 GTs are EXTREMELY slow... I consider a 15 second car pretty damn slow.