4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

driveshafts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2004, 06:56 PM
  #11  
SilverGTV8
4th Gear Member
 
SilverGTV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,974
Default RE: driveshafts?

Ummm you don't lose top end when you lighten componts. The effects become less apparent/negalable at higher speeds.

You drop revs much quicker and it is harder to keep the car in its power band if you can't/aren't shifting enough.
SilverGTV8 is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 07:49 PM
  #12  
stonemonk9
3rd Gear Member
 
stonemonk9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 715
Default RE: driveshafts?

Im pretty sure you loose top end. A lighter flywheel is easier to get started spinning, but once spinning is harder to make go faster so it takes more of your engine to turn it, where as a heavier flywheel is harder to get spinning, but once spinning its wieght makes it easier to push using less power therefore can go faster than lightwieght.
stonemonk9 is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 09:21 PM
  #13  
GTron
1st Gear Member
 
GTron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LONE STAR STATE
Posts: 109
Default RE: driveshafts?


ORIGINAL: SilverGTV8

Ummm you don't lose top end when you lighten componts. The effects become less apparent/negalable at higher speeds.

You drop revs much quicker and it is harder to keep the car in its power band if you can't/aren't shifting enough.
[sm=exactly.gif]
GTron is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 09:29 PM
  #14  
SilverGTV8
4th Gear Member
 
SilverGTV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,974
Default RE: driveshafts?

Top end has nothing to do with rotational masses. It is based on gearing, drag, weight, and HP.

How is it harder to keep going faster if it is lighter it is easier to turn making it EASIER to go faster. The mass of the fly wheel is what helps hold revs because it takes more time to slow down.

A lightened fly wheel is difficult to street expecially with high performance clutch. I had a 6lb flywheel and a Dual fritciton in my Honda. If I shifted at anything under 3k the car would buck like crazy when the clutch grabbed if the revs weren't up.
SilverGTV8 is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 10:03 PM
  #15  
stonemonk9
3rd Gear Member
 
stonemonk9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 715
Default RE: driveshafts?

ORIGINAL: 331foxSC

Yes it is worth it, I have had no problems with mine whatosever. When they said that a heavier flywheel would be better to retain motion energy and would be easier to spin, I think if you wound both up and a high rpm and let them coast to a stop, the heavier one would have more intertia (the wantingness of an object to stay in motion) than the lighter one, but that is just talking about a freeturning motion. When you are cruising around your motor still spins the rest of your drivetrain and a lighter flywheel takes less motor stress to turn.
I guess i was kinda on this guys principle of which ones spinning longer or somthn, o well lean somthn new everyday.
stonemonk9 is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 12:11 AM
  #16  
Acer2428
Site Mod
 
Acer2428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oh, Hi.... Oh?
Posts: 8,667
Default RE: driveshafts?

Stone...made sense to me....
Acer2428 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
07-26-2016 01:20 PM
Boostaddict
2.3L Eco-Boost Tech
2
11-24-2015 06:11 AM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
FivePointToTheOh
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
09-14-2015 03:35 PM



Quick Reply: driveshafts?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.