4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Procharger or Hellion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2007, 05:18 PM
  #11  
wwmost
5th Gear Member
 
wwmost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,534
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

ORIGINAL: ShadowDrake

ORIGINAL: Sap

Wow there is some ignorance in this thread. Explain how with a turbo setup there is more room to grow than with a blower? There isn't, there are bigger blowers just like there are bigger turbo's.

Choosing one or the other is up to you, blowers sap power because they are belt driven, but turbos produce higher underhood temperatures. It's just personal preference, I don't think with our cars there is a valid reason not to go with either and no compelling reasons to choose one over the other.

E.
Misinformation? Not quite, go ahead and look at dyno graphs and numbers of turbo stangs vs supercharged stangs here on the site... A turbo at 8 psi makes more power than a centri at 10, even up to 12 psi in some cases. The turbo kit he is going to be buying will have more power potential than the supercharger kit if he's looking at. Sure, he can get a bigger supercharger but that'll make that kit cost more than the turbo will.
exactly... you can expect 430 RWHP and 520 RWTQ @ 8psi of boost with pump gas. plus there is no need to change pullies constantly for different boost levels. you can get a boost controller and up the boost whenever you want.
wwmost is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 05:28 PM
  #12  
lighswitch
3rd Gear Member
 
lighswitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 837
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

http://www.turbochargedpower.com/200...Cunningham.htm
Misinformation ? Look the numbers dont lie 8lbs of boost with 468rwhp !! and its about 6500 bucks for the kit.
lighswitch is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 05:31 PM
  #13  
Sap
4th Gear Member
 
Sap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,181
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

How much power are we talking about, the standard V2 SQ S Trim blower is rated at up to 680 hp (http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...s+Supercharger)

A KB at 6PSI will make 400rwhp and a turbo at 6PSI will make 400rwhp.
http://www.dragtimes.com/2006-Ford-M...phs-10365.html
https://mustangforums.com/m_3440396/mpage_2/tm.htm

All I'm saying is that this misconception that a turbo can make more power then a blower is simply not true. Having a horsepower goal and choosing the right size and A/R's for your turbo is the same as having a horsepower goal and choosing the pulley for your blower.

E.




Sap is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 05:47 PM
  #14  
Quicktime_GT
5th Gear Member
 
Quicktime_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,406
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

I think the turbo kit would be cooler, but either one will take you as far as you can go on a stock bottom end..
Quicktime_GT is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 06:15 PM
  #15  
1BadSonicBlue02GT
4th Gear Member
 
1BadSonicBlue02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: N. Ft. Myers, Fl
Posts: 1,329
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

ORIGINAL: ColinGT

personally i would chose the super charger, i mean we got a muscle car for a reason, if i wanted turbo i woulda invested in a sti or evo
That was the stupidest thing i've read this week![sm=icon_beat.gif]
1BadSonicBlue02GT is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 06:32 PM
  #16  
chupac
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
chupac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 630
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

ORIGINAL: Quicktime_GT

I think the turbo kit would be cooler, but either one will take you as far as you can go on a stock bottom end..
The engine will not be stock. It should be able to support 800+hp. I'm really leaning towards the turbo just because the air density here can easily exceed 8000ft and turbos aren't affected as much. The only reason I'mthinking S/C is because of the heat produced by a turbo and this is a DD.
chupac is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 06:40 PM
  #17  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

ORIGINAL: Sap

How much power are we talking about, the standard V2 SQ S Trim blower is rated at up to 680 hp (http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...s+Supercharger)

A KB at 6PSI will make 400rwhp and a turbo at 6PSI will make 400rwhp.
http://www.dragtimes.com/2006-Ford-M...phs-10365.html
https://mustangforums.com/m_3440396/mpage_2/tm.htm

All I'm saying is that this misconception that a turbo can make more power then a blower is simply not true. Having a horsepower goal and choosing the right size and A/R's for your turbo is the same as having a horsepower goal and choosing the pulley for your blower.

E.




Anybody that says they have a stock shortblock/stock heads/stock cam car making 400 WHP on a 6 PSI kenne bell is full of ****. It simply will not make 400 with only 6 PSI ona Kb or centri.

Turbokits will make more power on an all out build than blower cars, hands down. Turbos are simply more effcient than superchargers, and PSI for PSI a turbo (on identical setups) will make more power. A blower will steal 40 some odd percent of the power they add to run the blowers, and turbos do not.

There are 800+ WHP 2v turbo cars out there, unlike supercharger setups.

However, on anything less than a full build S/C is the way to go. I have not been impressed by turbo setups on stock bottom ends, and everyone that has one seems to blow it up if they try to push it hard (on stock bottom end).

One thing though, how the hell is a hellion turbo kit around the same price as a procharger setup? A PS1C setup with i/c will run what, 4000~ bucks, with a D sieres only something like 400-600 more. Unless your getting a single (ftl) or a remote mount kit the helloin setups I have seen are 6000+
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 06:48 PM
  #18  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

ORIGINAL: Sap

How much power are we talking about, the standard V2 SQ S Trim blower is rated at up to 680 hp (http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...s+Supercharger)

A KB at 6PSI will make 400rwhp and a turbo at 6PSI will make 400rwhp.
http://www.dragtimes.com/2006-Ford-M...phs-10365.html
https://mustangforums.com/m_3440396/mpage_2/tm.htm

All I'm saying is that this misconception that a turbo can make more power then a blower is simply not true. Having a horsepower goal and choosing the right size and A/R's for your turbo is the same as having a horsepower goal and choosing the pulley for your blower.

E.




Anybody that says they have a stock shortblock/stock heads/stock cam car making 400 WHP on a 6 PSI kenne bell is full of ****. It simply will not make 400 with only 6 PSI ona Kb or centri.

Turbokits will make more power on an all out build than blower cars, hands down. Turbos are simply more effcient than superchargers, and PSI for PSI a turbo (on identical setups) will make more power. A blower will steal 40 some odd percent of the power they add to run the blowers, and turbos do not.

There are 800+ WHP 2v turbo cars out there, unlike supercharger setups.

However, on anything less than a full build S/C is the way to go. I have not been impressed by turbo setups on stock bottom ends, and everyone that has one seems to blow it up if they try to push it hard (on stock bottom end).

One thing though, how the hell is a hellion turbo kit around the same price as a procharger setup? A PS1C setup with i/c will run what, 4000~ bucks, with a D sieres only something like 400-600 more. Unless your getting a single (ftl) or a remote mount kit the helloin setups I have seen are 6000+
+1. they're like $6500 for the base kits on their website. i looked into one of those systems, but in the end, the T trim was a much better, cost effective solution than just going with turbos. i can get to ~700RWHP just as easily with the T for far less money.
nanaki is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 06:56 PM
  #19  
wwmost
5th Gear Member
 
wwmost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,534
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

plus you usually have to buy a tubular front end andcoilovers along with the kit.
wwmost is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 06:59 PM
  #20  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: Procharger or Hellion

oh yeah! new k member ftw!
nanaki is offline  


Quick Reply: Procharger or Hellion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.