marauders
#14
RE: marauders
ORIGINAL: wwmost
its not the 03/04 cobra engine if you are thinking that. its more of a mach/ 01 cobra motor. i dont know the spacifics but i know its not a supercharged 4v.
its not the 03/04 cobra engine if you are thinking that. its more of a mach/ 01 cobra motor. i dont know the spacifics but i know its not a supercharged 4v.
#16
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
RE: marauders
Faster than what stock GT? A 94-98? Perhaps.. but that would be about it.
I think they have low to mid 15 second quarter mile times because they weigh so damn much.
Fun platform, nice sleepers sort of, but stock, they arent faster than a New Edge GT by any means.
#17
RE: marauders
ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT
Faster than what stock GT? A 94-98? Perhaps.. but that would be about it.
I think they have low to mid 15 second quarter mile times because they weigh so damn much.
Fun platform, nice sleepers sort of, but stock, they arent faster than a New Edge GT by any means.
Faster than what stock GT? A 94-98? Perhaps.. but that would be about it.
I think they have low to mid 15 second quarter mile times because they weigh so damn much.
Fun platform, nice sleepers sort of, but stock, they arent faster than a New Edge GT by any means.
#19
RE: marauders
i remember before i got my stang i wanted a marauder, until i read about all the problems they have (#1 being the hood rattling during driving). i loved the dual exhaust.. but now i have a quicker sexier car, so im happy. but the Marauder definetly has potential
#20
RE: marauders
this thread shouldnt even be on here sorry to be the bug but this is for stangs i hate marauders nice engine given its close to "not really" a mustang engine but a 4 door town car lol no way
rare tho i give em that and that 32v will catch someone thats as far as i go with that
marauder= low performance
rare tho i give em that and that 32v will catch someone thats as far as i go with that
marauder= low performance