4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

marauders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2007, 08:02 AM
  #11  
02GTman
3rd Gear Member
 
02GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default RE: marauders

So, are they faster even though they weigh more?
02GTman is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 08:43 AM
  #12  
bigmoose15
2nd Gear Member
 
bigmoose15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: RI
Posts: 233
Default RE: marauders

it doesn't have a forged crank like the 4v cobras
bigmoose15 is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 10:21 AM
  #13  
jpmustanggt
5th Gear Member
 
jpmustanggt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,613
Default RE: marauders

Theres a guy around my part of town with a 560rwhp marauder.
jpmustanggt is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 10:39 AM
  #14  
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 4,412
Default RE: marauders

ORIGINAL: wwmost

its not the 03/04 cobra engine if you are thinking that. its more of a mach/ 01 cobra motor. i dont know the spacifics but i know its not a supercharged 4v.
They are like the 99 and 01 cobra engine. They are a tumble port design. The mach and the 01 cobra are not he same engine.
amoosenamedhank is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 11:01 AM
  #15  
whiterabit998
2nd Gear Member
 
whiterabit998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: vids> http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea
Posts: 249
Default RE: marauders

there faster than a stock gt! they sound beastly with an exhaust
whiterabit998 is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 11:14 AM
  #16  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default RE: marauders



Faster than what stock GT? A 94-98? Perhaps.. but that would be about it.

I think they have low to mid 15 second quarter mile times because they weigh so damn much.

Fun platform, nice sleepers sort of, but stock, they arent faster than a New Edge GT by any means.
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 01:59 PM
  #17  
2002GTAUTOVERT
5th Gear Member
 
2002GTAUTOVERT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,441
Default RE: marauders

ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT



Faster than what stock GT? A 94-98? Perhaps.. but that would be about it.

I think they have low to mid 15 second quarter mile times because they weigh so damn much.

Fun platform, nice sleepers sort of, but stock, they arent faster than a New Edge GT by any means.
itsa crown victoria with a somewhat similar cobra motor in it. the weight wont offset the power stock vs stock.
2002GTAUTOVERT is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 02:52 PM
  #18  
HamMach1
5th Gear Member
 
HamMach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 4,083
Default RE: marauders

Marauders have the heart of a Mach!
HamMach1 is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 03:08 PM
  #19  
2002GTAUTOVERT
5th Gear Member
 
2002GTAUTOVERT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,441
Default RE: marauders

i remember before i got my stang i wanted a marauder, until i read about all the problems they have (#1 being the hood rattling during driving). i loved the dual exhaust.. but now i have a quicker sexier car, so im happy. but the Marauder definetly has potential
2002GTAUTOVERT is offline  
Old 08-24-2007, 04:38 PM
  #20  
fullsteedahead
1st Gear Member
 
fullsteedahead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 87
Default RE: marauders

this thread shouldnt even be on here sorry to be the bug but this is for stangs i hate marauders nice engine given its close to "not really" a mustang engine but a 4 door town car lol no way

rare tho i give em that and that 32v will catch someone thats as far as i go with that

marauder= low performance
fullsteedahead is offline  


Quick Reply: marauders



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.