here are my dyno pics
02-22-2005, 02:43 AM
#11
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,129
RE: here are my dyno pics
ORIGINAL: jdaniel
He could IF he has an FMU and the 255lph pump.
ORIGINAL: BCisme
also, my stock injectors are maxed at 301.4 rwhp. my heads are ported and cammed. there's no way you are making more power. also, why didn't they tune your car to 6500 rpms? you couldn't run nitrous on stock 19 lb injectors and make that kind of power, you just aren't getting enough fuel. even with that pump. the injectors cant flow it.
you need to go back to the guy who tuned your car and smack him.
also, my stock injectors are maxed at 301.4 rwhp. my heads are ported and cammed. there's no way you are making more power. also, why didn't they tune your car to 6500 rpms? you couldn't run nitrous on stock 19 lb injectors and make that kind of power, you just aren't getting enough fuel. even with that pump. the injectors cant flow it.
you need to go back to the guy who tuned your car and smack him.
He could IF he has an FMU and the 255lph pump.
mustang dynos are inaccurate. period. his torque is about 60 ft lbs off.
MUSTANG DYNOS ARE NOT ACCURATE. JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE.
02-22-2005, 07:18 AM
#12
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 38
RE: here are my dyno pics
yeah those number are way off, i forget what magazine i was reading or it may have been the hotrod book but they rated different ways to view HP and a mustang dyno got a rating of 2 out of 5 and from waht i hear thats about right, they gave that G-tech pro meeter a rating of 4 of 5 and was the best score as far as horsepower accuracy..im planning on getting one but im going to use it as a tach to shift, you may want to check of of those out.
02-22-2005, 01:08 PM
#13
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 365
RE: here are my dyno pics
ORIGINAL: 04GTPony
yeah those number are way off, i forget what magazine i was reading or it may have been the hotrod book but they rated different ways to view HP and a mustang dyno got a rating of 2 out of 5 and from waht i hear thats about right, they gave that G-tech pro meeter a rating of 4 of 5 and was the best score as far as horsepower accuracy..im planning on getting one but im going to use it as a tach to shift, you may want to check of of those out.
yeah those number are way off, i forget what magazine i was reading or it may have been the hotrod book but they rated different ways to view HP and a mustang dyno got a rating of 2 out of 5 and from waht i hear thats about right, they gave that G-tech pro meeter a rating of 4 of 5 and was the best score as far as horsepower accuracy..im planning on getting one but im going to use it as a tach to shift, you may want to check of of those out.
02-22-2005, 04:22 PM
#14
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: here are my dyno pics
I have to agree w/ what everyone is saying. Without port work to the heads you are not gonna see even 300 RWHP, and that tq number is totally unbeileveable.
Even the spray numbers seem a bit off. I think somebody is joshing you here to get you to keep using their shop. Go to another shop w/ a dynojet and see what happens, I bet you will be unpleasently suprised.
Even the spray numbers seem a bit off. I think somebody is joshing you here to get you to keep using their shop. Go to another shop w/ a dynojet and see what happens, I bet you will be unpleasently suprised.
02-22-2005, 06:58 PM
#15
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 2,538
RE: here are my dyno pics
Eeven with the heads and cams you guys think he is still isn't close to 300rwhp? I would htink he would be damned close. But yea 371LbFt. of Torque is incredible. Incredibly high for your mods. But, if you run the times you have in your sig, then who gives fugg if the dyno #'s are off!
02-23-2005, 09:40 AM
#16
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 38
RE: here are my dyno pics
yeah tha g tech thing rated a 4, only other things that rated a 4 were your quarter mile top speed then some math equation that i couldnt figure out and another 4 was some other equation involving cylinder head airflow.
02-24-2005, 01:05 AM
#17
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 365
RE: here are my dyno pics
ORIGINAL: 04GTPony
yeah tha g tech thing rated a 4, only other things that rated a 4 were your quarter mile top speed then some math equation that i couldnt figure out and another 4 was some other equation involving cylinder head airflow.
yeah tha g tech thing rated a 4, only other things that rated a 4 were your quarter mile top speed then some math equation that i couldnt figure out and another 4 was some other equation involving cylinder head airflow.
02-24-2005, 01:21 AM
#18
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 598
RE: here are my dyno pics
do you have any time slips for the those 1/4 numbers that you posted???? thats what really matters... a dyno could say that you have 200hp but as long as you are running in the 12s and 11s-your car is quick regardless of how F'ed up any dyno is.
02-24-2005, 08:14 PM
#19
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 246
RE: here are my dyno pics
yes i do have timeslips. matter of fact i have about 150 of them. i run every weekend at budds creek in maryland. yes i do run 12.8's and 12.9's and then when i hit the 125 shot it does 11.7's but i do have proof.
02-24-2005, 08:16 PM
#20
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 246
RE: here are my dyno pics
i have a little more done then whats in my sig. cause the rest wouldnt fit like upper and lower control arms struts and shocks and an sct dyno tune. and intake plenum and throttle body. but thats all.