Blue Oval Control Arms?
#1
Blue Oval Control Arms?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/96-97...QQcmdZViewItem
Any good? I've got other blue oval stuff and so far so good...
E.
Any good? I've got other blue oval stuff and so far so good...
E.
#2
RE: Blue Oval Control Arms?
I had them, I replaced them w/ the Adjustable ones from StangSuspensions. They were good, I still have them.I will sell them to you if you want them. They are in good condition, but they need new bushings. PM me if interested.
#5
RE: Blue Oval Control Arms?
ORIGINAL: Cornbread01
might be dumb question but why would you want to take off the quad shock.
might be dumb question but why would you want to take off the quad shock.
I mean if you want to you can take off the quad shocks with the factory UCA and LCA. The quad shocksare there to minimize wheel hopthat is created by a less than perfect design of locating the driveshaft.While changing the CAs only makes up for less than perfect CA design it doesn't do anything to correct for the first problem. In order to do fix the location problem you need thing like panhard bars or a watts link.
#6
RE: Blue Oval Control Arms?
actually the wheel hop you would experience if you took the quad shocks off with the stock control arms could be more contributed to the deflection of the rubber. urethane eliminates most deflection hence the loss of need for the quad shocks .
a panhard bar only locates the rear side to side. i believe you mean a torque arm would be better as it would eliminate fluctuations in pinion angle.
a panhard bar only locates the rear side to side. i believe you mean a torque arm would be better as it would eliminate fluctuations in pinion angle.
#8
RE: Blue Oval Control Arms?
ORIGINAL: livefast1
actually the wheel hop you would experience if you took the quad shocks off with the stock control arms could be more contributed to the deflection of the rubber. urethane eliminates most deflection hence the loss of need for the quad shocks .
a panhard bar only locates the rear side to side. i believe you mean a torque arm would be better as it would eliminate fluctuations in pinion angle.
actually the wheel hop you would experience if you took the quad shocks off with the stock control arms could be more contributed to the deflection of the rubber. urethane eliminates most deflection hence the loss of need for the quad shocks .
a panhard bar only locates the rear side to side. i believe you mean a torque arm would be better as it would eliminate fluctuations in pinion angle.
#9
RE: Blue Oval Control Arms?
ORIGINAL: Cornbread01
might be dumb question but why would you want to take off the quad shock.
might be dumb question but why would you want to take off the quad shock.
Other than that, and the 2~ pounds of weight, I see no reason to remove the quad shocks. I left mine on even after the CA install.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post