anyone runnin' a 5.0 k member in a new edge?
#5
RE: anyone runnin' a 5.0 k member in a new edge?
The K mem kits are the same as for installation, which makes the pushrod swap a cinch in that respect. The A-arms are much narrower which will give the front end a narrower look and stance. Headers will need to be something like Kooks to get a good fitment and run solid motor mounts for a windsor set up to avoid height differences.
Let us know if you need more info, we've got the experience.
Let us know if you need more info, we've got the experience.
#6
RE: anyone runnin' a 5.0 k member in a new edge?
ORIGINAL: Texas_Hot_Rods
The K mem kits are the same as for installation, which makes the pushrod swap a cinch in that respect. The A-arms are much narrower which will give the front end a narrower look and stance. Headers will need to be something like Kooks to get a good fitment and run solid motor mounts for a windsor set up to avoid height differences.
Let us know if you need more info, we've got the experience.
The K mem kits are the same as for installation, which makes the pushrod swap a cinch in that respect. The A-arms are much narrower which will give the front end a narrower look and stance. Headers will need to be something like Kooks to get a good fitment and run solid motor mounts for a windsor set up to avoid height differences.
Let us know if you need more info, we've got the experience.
#7
RE: anyone runnin' a 5.0 k member in a new edge?
radical.....can anyone recommend a good aftermarket k member that doesn't cost $1,000 dollars,i figure no sense in going thru all this to bolt up a factory one[sm=goodidea.gif]
#10
RE: anyone runnin' a 5.0 k member in a new edge?
He says 351 but i say 460. Go all the way man. I saw a 2000 GT with a 460 in it on ebay
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM