4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

stroker kits VS natural stroke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2008, 08:18 PM
  #11  
livefast1
5th Gear Member
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,363
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

it just seemed as tho you were discouraging him from the stroker route due to the compression ratio, could of just been the way i read it tho. in my opinion if i was going the stroked route i would go with a 5.4, the larger deck height and stock rod length would prevent the common rocking of the skirt in the lower portion of the bore......... plus i believe the mmr 5.4 shortblock is like 2600 bux.
livefast1 is offline  
Old 01-26-2008, 08:27 PM
  #12  
rmr1923
1st Gear Member
 
rmr1923's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

ORIGINAL: livefast1

it just seemed as tho you were discouraging him from the stroker route due to the compression ratio, could of just been the way i read it tho. in my opinion if i was going the stroked route i would go with a 5.4, the larger deck height and stock rod length would prevent the common rocking of the skirt in the lower portion of the bore......... plus i believe the mmr 5.4 shortblock is like 2600 bux.
not at all, and i wasn't trying to pick a fight over it so i apologize. with the "textbook long" explanations, i just wanted to make sure he understood that an increase in stroke will raise the compression ratio unless he gets pistons with a larger dish to compensate for it. i've known people that didn't know this and ordered their stroker kits with the same piston dish as stock, and then had to return it or try to sell it after they'd already put the engine together. stroker kits come with lots of piston options and it can be overwhelming for someone who's not familiar with it all, so some people just order the -17 cc dish because that's what their stock pistons were. and +1 on the 5.4 short block... there's no replacement for displacement.
rmr1923 is offline  
Old 01-26-2008, 08:44 PM
  #13  
livefast1
5th Gear Member
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,363
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

i apologize i shuda read through a little more extensively my bad.
livefast1 is offline  
Old 01-26-2008, 09:19 PM
  #14  
Ecstasy
5th Gear Member
 
Ecstasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,601
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

ok since you build motors, if i bore & stroke my car from a 4.6 to a 5.0, i have the 4.6 dohc, 97 cobra. how much hp will i get from boring & stroking, of course id upgrade the cams a bit and port & polish the heads. what kind of gains would i expect? just out of curiousity.
Ecstasy is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 11:15 AM
  #15  
oxfordgt
6th Gear Member
 
oxfordgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,448
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

Very little gains from stoking a 4.6L since it has plenty of stroke as is. You need more bore to make power but not enough material for it.
oxfordgt is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 11:25 AM
  #16  
Fobra
Banned
 
Fobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 4,064
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke



ORIGINAL: Ecstasy

ok since you build motors, if i bore & stroke my car from a 4.6 to a 5.0, i have the 4.6 dohc, 97 cobra. how much hp will i get from boring & stroking, of course id upgrade the cams a bit and port & polish the heads. what kind of gains would i expect? just out of curiousity.
boring to a 5.0 on a 4v can net 30-50 rwhp
Fobra is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 11:26 AM
  #17  
Fobra
Banned
 
Fobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 4,064
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

with heads and cams, etc and esp with FI
Fobra is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 11:55 AM
  #18  
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 4,412
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

ORIGINAL: oxfordgt

Very little gains from stoking a 4.6L since it has plenty of stroke as is. You need more bore to make power but not enough material for it.
This is the quote that should be in everyone's sig. This is what is killing the 4.6. Beyond our crappy heads and intake, this is our next largest limiting factor.
amoosenamedhank is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 01:02 PM
  #19  
texas_stang02
3rd Gear Member
 
texas_stang02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 732
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

the stock 4.6 already has a pretty long stroke in relation to its bore size. just for comparison, the stock 4.6 has a larger stroke-to-bore ratio than a chevy 383 stroker, so stroking it even further would be pretty useless. i've read that you can only bore a 4.6 up to .030" overbore safely, any more than that and the cylinder walls will just be too thin, and a .030" overbore will only gain you about 5 ci, so there's no power to be gained there. you can have the block sleeved and get up to 3.7" bore, which would net you about 305 ci (5.0L), but i'm not sure that it's a very cost-effective option.
texas_stang02 is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 02:57 PM
  #20  
Eagle2000GT
4th Gear Member
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,088
Default RE: stroker kits VS natural stroke

We are running a pretty smallmotor with only a3.55 bore. One of the reason we have "crappy 2v heads" is becausethere just isn't enough room for bigger 2v valves. That's whyFord went with 3v and 4v heads. The Patriot stageIII head has bigger2v valves but you have to bore the motor .030 over touse them.

I have read posts from people who were very disappointed with the horsepower that they got from a stroker 4.6. The most woeful was a tale of a guy who bought a stroker short block which gets its power down low, put on new high-flow high-rpm heads, and a mid-range cam. He was disappointed because even with other mods he couldn't make 300 rwhp. I spoke to an engine builder about this and he said it was very hard to talk customers out of the stroker since they were about the same price as a regular forged kit.

I'm pretty sure you will be disappointed as well. A Procharger, like all centrifical superchargers, get its power at high rpms. Putting in a stroker kit which limits your rpms is a waste of the Procharger's potential. Your best bet would be to get a forged short block with the standard stroke that can run 7000 rpms. This will really bring out the F1As potential.
Eagle2000GT is offline  


Quick Reply: stroker kits VS natural stroke



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.