4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2003, 10:20 PM
  #1  
jonnieboy239
Thread Starter
 
jonnieboy239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 19
Default intake



arethere any difference between these three intakes and if so what are they? <FONT face=Tahoma color=#990000></FONT></P>


<FONT face=Tahoma color=#990000>BBK Cold Air Induction System 96-03 4.6L GT, http://www.lmperformance.com/3580/50.html</FONT></P>


<FONT face=Tahoma color=#990000>K&amp;N Fuel Injection Performance Kit 96-03 Mustang GT http://www.lmperformance.com/3573/50.html</FONT></P>


<FONT face=Tahoma color=#990000>Superflow Air Intake System Chrome Cold Air Kit Mustang GT 94-03</FONT>
<FONT face=Tahoma color=#990000>http://www.lmperformance.com/3576/50.html</FONT></P>
jonnieboy239 is offline  
Old 10-11-2003, 10:24 PM
  #2  
jonnieboy239
Thread Starter
 
jonnieboy239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 19
Default intake



and also this kit </P>


Steeda GT High-Flow air kit</P>


http://www.mustangtuning.com/stgthiairkit.html </P>
jonnieboy239 is offline  
Old 10-11-2003, 11:31 PM
  #3  
jonnieboy239
Thread Starter
 
jonnieboy239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 19
Default intake



<FONT color=#000080><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT size=5>96-03 GT,COBRA,BULLIT COLD AIR INTAKE -FENDER MOUNT</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>


http://ageclassic.com/Merchant2/merc...egory_Code=860</P>
jonnieboy239 is offline  
Old 10-11-2003, 11:40 PM
  #4  
InMyRearView
1st Gear Member
 
InMyRearView's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 147
Default intake



<FONT size=2>I would probably choose the K&amp;N overall. All three accomplish the same task but the difference with the K&amp;N is that is plastic instead of metal. Metal is subject to heat soak from the engine which equates to hotter air. The temperature difference may be marginal between the plastic CAI and the metal one but the purpose of a CAI is to provide COOLER, smoother, and improved air flow. While the chrome does look good, im willing to bet that a similar plastic or rubber product will perform better.</FONT></P>
InMyRearView is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 12:20 AM
  #5  
frostymug
1st Gear Member
 
frostymug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 120
Default intake



I don't believe the K&amp;N draws from outside the fenderwell though. While it might not be too big of a difference, it would be roughly the same or greaterthan the difference between chrome and plastic.</P>


You could also check out www.densecharger.com</P>


I looked around quite a bit before deciding on it. Plastic, draws from fenderwell vs. engine bay, uses a genuine tried and true K&amp;N filter, and is cheaper than the ones you were looking at to boot.</P>
frostymug is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 11:46 AM
  #6  
gdear66
2nd Gear Member
 
gdear66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lufkin, TX
Posts: 215
Default intake

If you get an aluminum CAI kit, you shouldn't have the problem with it heating up and warming the air too much. The plastic kit seems that it would allow for the heat to penetrate as opposed to aluminum which resists heating up pretty well.
gdear66 is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 12:29 PM
  #7  
frostymug
1st Gear Member
 
frostymug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 120
Default intake



Originally Posted by gdear66
If you get an aluminum CAI kit, you shouldn't have the problem with it heating up and warming the air too much. The plastic kit seems that it would allow for the heat to penetrate as opposed to aluminum which resists heating up pretty well.
</P>


This is where things get somewhat deceptive. I used to thinkthe same thing pretty much. Drive aroundfor a while with an aluminumone on and then pop the hood and grab it. On the other hand, it's not gonna heat up the air all that much during the split second the air is in it.</P>


The moral of the story is find the one you like, be it for looks or numbers. If you get the one you like, you can't go wrong.</P>


</P>


</P>


Unless it is that March ram airkit.....</P>
frostymug is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 12:43 PM
  #8  
Tech@ssd4u.com
Former Sponsor
 
Tech@ssd4u.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 41
Default intake



Greetings All,</P>


If you plan to add a high performance mass airflow sensor in the future I would recommend that you avoid CAI's that put a bend in front of the mass airflow sensor. A bend in front of the MAS can throw off the calibration. The K&amp;N does not have a bend, Volant does not have a bend and here is another option that does not have a bend:</P>


https://mustangforums.com/forum_post...=3960&amp;PN=1</P>


Good Luck.</P>
Tech@ssd4u.com is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 07:36 PM
  #9  
GSRGuy18
2nd Gear Member
 
GSRGuy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 440
Default intake

From my experiences with Mustang owners, Densecharger is one of the best.
GSRGuy18 is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 08:09 PM
  #10  
jonnieboy239
Thread Starter
 
jonnieboy239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 19
Default intake

ya the densecharger does look and sound pretty sick. for sure it will either be that or a K&amp;N kit.
jonnieboy239 is offline  


Quick Reply: intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.