2v coolant mod
03-27-2008, 07:45 AM
#1
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
2v coolant mod
I am not debating it's effectiveness, only it's proper placement.
With the cool passage tapped on the back of the intake (not the head) which is the best place for the return passage; the opposite side of the intake with a T fitting OR in the front of the intake.
With the cool passage tapped on the back of the intake (not the head) which is the best place for the return passage; the opposite side of the intake with a T fitting OR in the front of the intake.
03-27-2008, 10:31 PM
#6
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 5,726
RE: 2v coolant mod
I tapped into the return line of the waterpump with a T fitting (on the rubber hose). The metal line runs under the intake then intake a rubber hose that is the hose that I T'ed into.
03-28-2008, 07:33 PM
#7
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
RE: 2v coolant mod
I did it the way you did it.
Have you had anyone tell you that it doesn't create a constant flow through the engine and that it's not effective? Thats what I was told.
Also someone on another forum said that if you delete the Heater system all together it frees up 10+rwhp because the water is flowing in a continous dirrection with no presure/dirrection interuptions. any thoughts??
Mike
Have you had anyone tell you that it doesn't create a constant flow through the engine and that it's not effective? Thats what I was told.
Also someone on another forum said that if you delete the Heater system all together it frees up 10+rwhp because the water is flowing in a continous dirrection with no presure/dirrection interuptions. any thoughts??
Mike
03-29-2008, 12:55 AM
#9
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: 2v coolant mod
ORIGINAL: sxynerd
I did it the way you did it.
Have you had anyone tell you that it doesn't create a constant flow through the engine and that it's not effective? Thats what I was told.
Also someone on another forum said that if you delete the Heater system all together it frees up 10+rwhp because the water is flowing in a continous dirrection with no presure/dirrection interuptions. any thoughts??
Mike
I did it the way you did it.
Have you had anyone tell you that it doesn't create a constant flow through the engine and that it's not effective? Thats what I was told.
Also someone on another forum said that if you delete the Heater system all together it frees up 10+rwhp because the water is flowing in a continous dirrection with no presure/dirrection interuptions. any thoughts??
Mike
03-29-2008, 09:22 AM
#10
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 5,726
RE: 2v coolant mod
ORIGINAL: sxynerd
I did it the way you did it.
Have you had anyone tell you that it doesn't create a constant flow through the engine and that it's not effective? Thats what I was told.
Also someone on another forum said that if you delete the Heater system all together it frees up 10+rwhp because the water is flowing in a continous dirrection with no presure/dirrection interuptions. any thoughts??
Mike
I did it the way you did it.
Have you had anyone tell you that it doesn't create a constant flow through the engine and that it's not effective? Thats what I was told.
Also someone on another forum said that if you delete the Heater system all together it frees up 10+rwhp because the water is flowing in a continous dirrection with no presure/dirrection interuptions. any thoughts??
Mike