4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

is this true

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2008, 08:44 AM
  #11  
1sloblckgt
4th Gear Member
 
1sloblckgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 1,296
Default RE: is this true

I would rather go with oxford's Idea.
1sloblckgt is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:37 AM
  #12  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default RE: is this true

At the same time, while it might be more expsensive and not make the same amount of power, it sure would be awfully unique ( as well as awesome ) to tell people your car was running a blower and a turbo.
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:54 AM
  #13  
baino
4th Gear Member
 
baino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,077
Default RE: is this true

thats gotta be a pain to tune
baino is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:57 AM
  #14  
GodAmGT00
5th Gear Member
 
GodAmGT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In between Your Mom's Titties, skeet skeet..
Posts: 2,045
Default RE: is this true

It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..

I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...



JT
GodAmGT00 is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 12:51 PM
  #15  
Mr Graystang
4th Gear Member
 
Mr Graystang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,944
Default RE: is this true

ORIGINAL: GodAmGT00

It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..

I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...



JT
It be alot kooler to have s/c low end boost then swing right into turbo high end boost tho ! Them turbo'd terminators are killers , Producing like 600 to 720 rwhp.
Mr Graystang is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 02:55 PM
  #16  
562cobra
5th Gear Member
 
562cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Compton
Posts: 2,915
Default RE: is this true

i read an article from mm&ff where they did just that on an 03-04 cobra and pumped out more than 1000 to the wheel. and it was with the stock eaton with a stock pulley.
562cobra is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 07:41 PM
  #17  
Ryan86272
5th Gear Member
 
Ryan86272's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: same as you.
Posts: 3,287
Default RE: is this true

ORIGINAL: Mr Graystang

ORIGINAL: GodAmGT00

It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..

I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...



JT
It be alot kooler to have s/c low end boost then swing right into turbo high end boost tho ! Them turbo'd terminators are killers , Producing like 600 to 720 rwhp.
You do know When people put the Turbo Kits on their Termie they Dont use their S/c RIght.... Few have GUTTED the S/c and Used it as a Intake Manifold..
Ryan86272 is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 07:43 PM
  #18  
Ryan86272
5th Gear Member
 
Ryan86272's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: same as you.
Posts: 3,287
Default RE: is this true

ORIGINAL: Mr Graystang

ORIGINAL: GodAmGT00

It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..

I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...



JT
It be alot kooler to have s/c low end boost then swing right into turbo high end boost tho ! Them turbo'd terminators are killers , Producing like 600 to 720 rwhp.
You do know When people put the Turbo Kits on their Termie they Dont use their S/c RIght.... Few have GUTTED the S/c and Used it as a Intake Manifold..

and thats what TWIN Turbo's are for.... You Can get 2 diff size tturbo's like Ox said and One is LOW END, the Other it Highend. The only reason for putting a S/c and A Turbo on the car is a Bragging Right really.... I mean if it were really a GOOOD IDEA dont u think Pro Racers Would be Doing that instead of F1 S/c or MONSTER TURBO's


Ryan86272 is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 07:47 PM
  #19  
02 Ninja
5th Gear Member
 
02 Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,074
Default RE: is this true

Why would anyone want to do that? Just seems to me as if it would be a PITA. Pick one, run a s/c or go TT. WTF anyone would want to do that is beyond me because i'm sure you could find something else to do with that money.
02 Ninja is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Granatelli Sales
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
22
01-20-2020 12:34 AM
winner99
S197 Handling Section
3
09-30-2015 07:04 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
2015Ecoboost
New Member Area
3
09-17-2015 01:48 PM
TfcCDR
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
0
09-12-2015 04:13 PM



Quick Reply: is this true



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.