is this true
#12
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
RE: is this true
At the same time, while it might be more expsensive and not make the same amount of power, it sure would be awfully unique ( as well as awesome ) to tell people your car was running a blower and a turbo.
#14
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In between Your Mom's Titties, skeet skeet..
Posts: 2,045
RE: is this true
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
#15
RE: is this true
ORIGINAL: GodAmGT00
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
#17
RE: is this true
ORIGINAL: Mr Graystang
It be alot kooler to have s/c low end boost then swing right into turbo high end boost tho ! Them turbo'd terminators are killers , Producing like 600 to 720 rwhp.
ORIGINAL: GodAmGT00
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
#18
RE: is this true
ORIGINAL: Mr Graystang
It be alot kooler to have s/c low end boost then swing right into turbo high end boost tho ! Them turbo'd terminators are killers , Producing like 600 to 720 rwhp.
ORIGINAL: GodAmGT00
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
It'd be similar to tuning a Dual turbo set-up.. However, without beating up the symantics of it, a bi-turboed car is the one with the smaller turbo spooling the larger turbo.. A twin turbo is just that: 2 identically matched turbos, providing equal boost pressure across the entire RPM band..
I could definitely see how a S/Cer would be a restriction, for MANY reasons.. Regardless, turbos are 100x more efficient than S/Cers in ALL aspects...
JT
and thats what TWIN Turbo's are for.... You Can get 2 diff size tturbo's like Ox said and One is LOW END, the Other it Highend. The only reason for putting a S/c and A Turbo on the car is a Bragging Right really.... I mean if it were really a GOOOD IDEA dont u think Pro Racers Would be Doing that instead of F1 S/c or MONSTER TURBO's
#19
RE: is this true
Why would anyone want to do that? Just seems to me as if it would be a PITA. Pick one, run a s/c or go TT. WTF anyone would want to do that is beyond me because i'm sure you could find something else to do with that money.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM