short tubes or long tube headers
#11
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
ORIGINAL: SeanAndKate
does long tubes affect being able to lower the car?
does long tubes affect being able to lower the car?
#12
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
#13
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
okay, here's a general question regarding long tubes. since dh04redgt already has o/r x pipe, couldnt he have them cut or modified to fit l/t's? if it wouldnt be too costly, then he would def be better off going w/ l/t's
#14
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
ORIGINAL: Eagle2000GT
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
#15
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
[sm=icon_blah.gif] [sm=icon_blah.gif] [sm=icon_blah.gif] [sm=icon_blah.gif] [sm=icon_blah.gif] [sm=icon_blah.gif]
You guys are like a bunch of little girls...
Go with longtubes.
I dont want to hear anything about wasting money on different midpipes. I bought an O/R X pipe and had it for about a year, I just bought and installed a MAC O/R H a month ago, and now I have LT's and a Shorty H sitting in my Basement... I wish I would have started off with longtubes from the beginning, but i thought that I just wanted it to sound better... That was until the power bug hit me and now I have over 13,000$ in the car... not including the cost of the car.
You guys are like a bunch of little girls...
Go with longtubes.
I dont want to hear anything about wasting money on different midpipes. I bought an O/R X pipe and had it for about a year, I just bought and installed a MAC O/R H a month ago, and now I have LT's and a Shorty H sitting in my Basement... I wish I would have started off with longtubes from the beginning, but i thought that I just wanted it to sound better... That was until the power bug hit me and now I have over 13,000$ in the car... not including the cost of the car.
#16
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
ORIGINAL: jwarner0297
Why do you say that?? 5.0 magazine had an article on 4.6L bolt ons and got 3 rwhp with an "out of the box" tune. with welded in cherry bomb mufflers they got 7 rwhp. With those two you got 10 rwHP already. Yeah I agree that is not a lot but with midpipe and headers added it will go over 20 rwhp.
ORIGINAL: Eagle2000GT
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
#17
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
ORIGINAL: tmcc02gt
okay, here's a general question regarding long tubes. since dh04redgt already has o/r x pipe, couldnt he have them cut or modified to fit l/t's? if it wouldnt be too costly, then he would def be better off going w/ l/t's
okay, here's a general question regarding long tubes. since dh04redgt already has o/r x pipe, couldnt he have them cut or modified to fit l/t's? if it wouldnt be too costly, then he would def be better off going w/ l/t's
#18
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
ORIGINAL: Eagle2000GT
I was talking about 5 rwhp on top of what he already has. He has already gained the rwhp for the mid-pipes. By the way, most people who do before and after dynos don't see a 20 rwhp gains. One member of this forum posted that they got 7 rwhp. Another with a supercharger got 12 rwhp. I didn't see any horsepower gain but I did get more torque.
ORIGINAL: jwarner0297
Why do you say that?? 5.0 magazine had an article on 4.6L bolt ons and got 3 rwhp with an "out of the box" tune. with welded in cherry bomb mufflers they got 7 rwhp. With those two you got 10 rwHP already. Yeah I agree that is not a lot but with midpipe and headers added it will go over 20 rwhp.
ORIGINAL: Eagle2000GT
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
You will most likely not see the gains others have mentioned. Naturally aspirated motors usually see gains of 7-20 rwhp for LTs, mid-pipe and a tune. Since you already have a mid-pipe you might get 5 rwhp, maybe less.
#19
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
ORIGINAL: n0th1n2kn0vv
I would just go with the long tubes because later on, your going to want to get more power and better sound out of it with that addiction you have
Instead of wasting money on shorties, do the longtubes from the start and you will not have to think about changing it again.
I would just go with the long tubes because later on, your going to want to get more power and better sound out of it with that addiction you have
Instead of wasting money on shorties, do the longtubes from the start and you will not have to think about changing it again.
#20
RE: short tubes or long tube headers
my old Gt dynoed at 160rwhp and 300rwtq. anyways if id do LT's then i'd dyno at 280rwhp. they actaually add 10-20 wheel horsepower. shorties don't do nothing. Stock are just as good!