4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Cams or more boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2008, 11:38 AM
  #21  
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 4,412
Default

No I understood what you were saying. I was just making sure what I said wasn't misunderstood.
amoosenamedhank is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 08:51 PM
  #22  
mustangman281
Banned
 
mustangman281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: tn
Posts: 0
Default

I was refering to amoosenamedhank driveability comment.

I have a buddy running comp cams 278s that I installed for him(so I know they were installed correctly) and the car drives like stock but with more power.

Sorry man but you have the crappiest cams on the market. SHM sucks *****.
mustangman281 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
TCStangerv6
Street/Strip
12
10-11-2015 05:57 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
10-05-2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM



Quick Reply: Cams or more boost?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.