4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Dyno or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2009, 09:28 PM
  #11  
dimebag
6th Gear Member
 
dimebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earleville md
Posts: 10,357
Default

theres usually the one in glasgow de, in peoples plaza shopping center every summer. thats what i meant.
dimebag is offline  
Old 01-10-2009, 10:18 PM
  #12  
vanquish
4th Gear Member
 
vanquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,600
Default

nice i'll definately try and remember that.
vanquish is offline  
Old 01-10-2009, 10:25 PM
  #13  
dimebag
6th Gear Member
 
dimebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earleville md
Posts: 10,357
Default

it sucks, i never know when it is, then ill drive by and hey look a car show, lets go... one of those deals... ill try to look into it
dimebag is offline  
Old 01-10-2009, 11:55 PM
  #14  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

There is nothing magical about a "dyno tune", in fact the presence or lack of presence of dynamometer has nothing to do with tuning an engine.

The dynamometer is just a convenient way of measuring the success or failure of the changes to the tune. As stated above it has nothing to do with tuning the engine, and there are other ways of measuring changes in engine output that are just as accurate, and arguably more accurate, than having the car tied down and sitting in one place, with one or more fans blowing on the radiator.

The G-Tech type accelerometers are very good for determining changes from a base performance reading, I have one of the original G-Tech models that's nearly 10 years old and use it all the time. Also even an experienced butt-dyno can often work well.

I've made at least 200 dyno pulls over the years, I've done 4 sessions (14 pulls) in the 2 years I've had my '03 GT, and have tweaked things between pulls on nearly every run, which is "dyno tuning"--however I have also almost every time gone directly from the dyno shop to a track and/or lonely stretch of back road to really get things dialed in. The dyno can give you some numbers to see where you are but that's about it...

As to the OP's question, regardless of whether it's a "dyno tune" or "a person with a sniper tuner and a wideband sensor..." there will be a wideband O2 sensor involved. If you show up for a dyno tune and they don't have a WB sensor then find another shop.

My final comment is that if a "dyno tune" were the ultimate in optimising engine performance why do you see racing teams retuning on race day, and often during the day as weather and track conditions change, without using a dynamometer? I mean couldn't they just tune it in the shop and be done with it?

I have three tunes that I regularly used in my GT, one for each of the 2-1/2 seasons we have here in Northeast Florida (nice, OK, and HOT)--that is one of the significant advantages of having the tools and KSAs (Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities) to do it yourself.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 12:39 PM
  #15  
02dkbluegt
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
02dkbluegt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 128
Default

Aside from AFR, what is a typical tuner at a "dyno shop" looking at when tuning a car? Sorry if this is a dumb question.
02dkbluegt is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 01:28 PM
  #16  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Fuel (AFR) and ignition timing are the two primary considerations--and I really don't mean to sound like a broken record here, but a dynamometer doesn't measure either of these.

You tune fueling for the desired AFR, and timing for maximum HP/torque. This latter generally happens when the spark is advanced as far as possible without causing detonation, however this is not always so. Rule of thumb is that target AFR at WOT for n/a is 12.5:1 to 13.0:1, however I like to run a bit richer at 12.2:1 to 12.5:1 as it lets you push the timing a bit harder.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:14 PM
  #17  
02dkbluegt
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
02dkbluegt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 128
Default

thanks for all the help cliffyk, what i was really trying to figure out is if a professional tuner using a dyno had any advantage over me tuning my own car on the street with the proper equipment (basically a wideband). i'm a do it yourself kinda person, and id really like the idea of being able to tweak my tune whenever i want
02dkbluegt is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 07:17 PM
  #18  
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
justinschmidt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

Originally Posted by lizzyfan
Well I am a try believer of the street tune as long as the tuner uses the same software as a dyno. Don't get me wrong, I used to be "only tune on a dyno" until I had an actual street tune done. The both have their pro's and con's but on the street is "real world" scenario!!
+1

My car was also street tuned my Matt at PE.

I beat the **** out of my car with 10 psi, daily drive, have yet to have any kind of problem
justinschmidt1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
04-29-2019 02:56 PM
articman
General Tech
1
06-21-2018 11:45 PM
heslekrants
Street/Strip
11
09-23-2015 04:02 PM
The01Cav
North East
0
09-05-2015 03:39 PM
The01Cav
Maryland Regional Chapter
0
08-31-2015 04:12 PM



Quick Reply: Dyno or no?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.